Declining US Drug Overdose Deaths: Evidence-Based Prevention and Treatment Working

Newswise — WASHINGTON, DC — A new editorial in the BMJ suggests that a 22% decrease in overall U.S. drug overdose deaths over 2023/2024 signals that investments in overdose prevention and substance use disorder treatment are working. In Avoiding a new US “war on drugs”: Declining US drug overdose deaths show that evidence-based public health approaches work (Vincent Guilamo-Ramos, Adam Benzekri, Loftin Wilson, and Marissa D. Abram), the authors call for more investment in treatment and prevention to accelerate progress — and to reject calls for a return to “War on Drugs” tactics that bipartisan experts believe didn’t work.

“Evidence-based prevention and treatment are working in communities across the entire country. There’s also a growing sense across the ideological divide that this is the smartest approach, while the ‘War on Drugs’ simply wasn’t — because it was law enforcement-focused, disproportionately harmed communities of color, was a waste of money, and it just didn’t work. In an era of increased appetite for criminalizing health and social problems, we have already learned that addiction is best addressed with care, not convictions.  Bottom line: a return to ‘War on Drugs’ tactics could reverse the progress made in the overdose crisis and make the situation much worse,” said Dr. Vincent Guilamo-Ramos, IPS Executive Director and the Leona B. Carpenter Chair in Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health at Johns Hopkins School of Nursing. 

The editorial explores what is most likely driving the welcome decline in deaths – and why in some states overdoses are rising. It looks at how more “tough on crime” messaging could lead to a more law enforcement-driven response to drug taking and overdoses – pushing back progress, especially in communities of color where the decline has been slower. It explores existing prevention and treatment successes – such as major changes in opioid medication prescription policies and practices, expanded access to opioid use disorder medications, and the scaling-up of community-based harm reduction services. Finally, it notes promising new strategies to further eliminate substance related prevention and treatment inequities such as: community and family-based models of prevention and treatment service delivery in marginalised communities and achieving a health workforce more representative of the populations served.

“Making the right call at this moment-of-opportunity is key to save and improve more lives. The wrong call is for approaches that are ineffective and unjust; this would fail all US communities — especially those in which overdose deaths continue to rise. It’s time to get tougher FOR prevention and treatment, for MORE targeted investment in prevention and treatment – and not to repeat the mistakes of the past,” Guilamo-Ramos stressed. 

ENDS

Notes to editors

A: Overdose Death Rate per 100,000 (age-adjusted)

B: Number of Overdose Deaths

More on IPS

The Institute for Policy Solutions (IPS) at Johns Hopkins School of Nursing ends health inequities through evidence-based policy solutions. IPS is focused on nurse-driven solutions to solve one of the country’s most alarming and unsustainable problems: health inequities. Nurses bring novel solutions to health system reform that optimize health for all — no matter who you are or where you live. Our expertise and insight into the systems that deliver care and impact health, as well as what matters to patients, families, and communities, uniquely position the nursing profession to transform health care delivery to prioritize health and well-being. Through nurse leadership, the Institute drives collaborations with interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral partners in dialogue, discovery, and the adoption of solutions for making optimal health attainable for all. Details at ipsnow.org

Online Curriculum Aids Prescribers in Fighting Opioid Addiction Across Appalachia

BYLINE: Steven Infanti

The Appalachian region continues to experience disproportionately higher opioid overdose rates and related fatalities. According to the most recent Center for Disease Control and Prevention, fully one-half of the 16 states with the highest overdose death rates are Appalachian states. West Virginia tops the list, and is joined by, in descending order, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Maryland. And although the CDC’s data shows a 4% overall overdose death rate decline, the statistics for Appalachia remain stubbornly high.

A Philadelphia-based non-profit foundation is combating the opioid addiction epidemic at the source by educating frontline allied health professionals on various aspects of the nation’s opioid crisis, specifically in Pennsylvania and the Appalachian region.

The Rothman Orthopaedic Institute Foundation for Opioid Research and Education (aka, Rothman Opioid Foundation) is a leader in opioid-related research and education. Thanks to a three-year grant from the federal Appalachian Regional Commission and support from the Pennsylvania General Assembly, the Foundation has used its expertise to educate allied health professionals in Pennsylvania and the broader Appalachian region on proper opioid prescribing and use.

Rothman Opioid Foundation has created and distributes opioid education curricula at no cost for the 75 allied healthcare professional training programs, such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants, at collegiate institutions across the Appalachian Region. In particular, the Foundation has produced an 8-module online pain management curriculum designed to complement any training program focusing on evidence-based pain management using opioid-sparing strategies.

“Physician assistants and nurse practitioners are valued professionals and are often on the front line of primary care and pain management, and they will greatly benefit from formal training in opioid pharmacology, use, abuse, and safe evidenced-based pain management strategies,” says Dr. Asif Ilyas, MD, MBA, FACS, President of the Rothman Opioid Foundation in Philadelphia, PA. The Foundation has developed its curriculum as a prescriber-training program and is offering this eight-hour course free of charge. It is an online, self-paced certificate program designed to effortlessly complement students’ current curriculum in the clinical phases of their training and prescribers in practice. The targeted allied health professionals include nurse practitioners (NPs) and physicians’ assistants (PAs). The curriculum’s training includes, but not be limited to, opioid prescribing guidelines and indications, pain management alternatives to opioids, identification of potential opioid abuse, and intervention strategies. Additional educational programs will include online webinar series and in-person events when feasible. The curriculum is designed to complement the clinical phase of NP and PA training programs but can be implemented at any stage in training. While designed specifically for NP and PA students, the Rothman Opioid Foundation submitted the course material to a rigorous national accreditation process. As a result, the curriculum has been accredited for up to 13.5 Continuing Medical Education (CME) credit hours. It satisfies the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency Medication Assisted Treatment Education (DEA MATE) Act 8-hour training requirement on the treatment and management of patients with opioid or other substance use disorders. That means any licensed prescriber, physician, NP, or PA can obtain the required CME or DEA MATE opioid training through this vital course material. While most opioid-related education currently targets physicians, Ilyas says, NPs and PAs often interact more with individuals who are suffering from or are susceptible to opioid misuse.

“NPs and PAs have prescribing rights. They are vital physician extenders who need to be educated and recruited in the fight against the opioid addiction crisis across the Appalachian region,” says Ilyas. “This information will be tailored specifically to these allied health professionals to mitigate the rate of opioid addiction at the source by teaching proper opioid use and early symptoms of misuse to decrease the risk of opioid dependency and abuse. “The Rothman Opioid Foundation plans to partner with colleges and universities to distribute this information to as many healthcare students as possible in the Appalachian Region. This project’s ultimate goals are to ensure that PAs and NPs have the proper resources and education to advise on proper opioid use and its alternatives, recognize the initial symptoms of opioid misuse and abuse, and understand when and how to intervene when substance abuse occurs.“The opioid addiction crisis has taken a drastic toll on the Appalachian region and the country. To lower the chance of misuse and overdose in patients, it is imperative that our local frontline healthcare workers are adequately trained and educated in the pathophysiology of opioid addiction, and they have resources available to guide effective and safe pain management,” says Ilyas.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 130 Americans die every day from opioid overdose. This includes prescription and illicit opioids. Low-income and rural areas are among the most likely to experience the opioid addiction crisis’s adverse effects, as evidenced by data published by the Appalachian Regional Commission. Rural residents are at greater risk in part due to a lack of resources or healthcare  services to address their addiction. These regions often lack accessible health services, especially those considered “specialized” services, such as addiction treatment.In addition, communities with a high uninsured population are at greater addiction risk as individuals without healthcare insurance are much less likely to receive treatment than those who are insured. These individuals are more likely to seek primary care through an urgent care setting, generally staffed by a physician extender (PAs and NPs).

As noted above, these allied health professionals have not always received the opioid-related education that their physician counterparts have.“Therefore, it is essential that professional education, designed to provide allied health professionals with the tools necessary to both manage pain in an evidenced-based opioid-sparing manner as well as screen for and identify addiction in the primary care setting visit, is available across Appalachia’s rural regions,” says Ilyas. Rothman Opioid Foundation is committed to providing the educational tools needed by our allied health professionals across the Appalachian region as they serve and treat on the front line of the opioid crisis. Information on the curriculum is found here: https://www.rothmanopioid.org/opioids-pain-management

About the Rothman Orthopaedic Institute Foundation for Opioid Research and Education.

The Rothman Orthopaedic Institute Foundation for Opioid Research & Education, www.rothmanopioid.org , is a non-profit 501c3 organization dedicated to raising awareness of the risks and benefits of opioids, educating physicians/physicians/policymakers on safe opioid use, and supporting research and education aimed to advance innovate pain management strategies that can decrease opioid use. The Foundation supports and advances the highest quality research on opioids and alternative pain modalities to yield findings that can better inform patients, physicians, and the greater healthcare community in the most evidenced-based pain management strategies.

Scientists Discover How Genetic Risk for Alcoholism Changes Brain Cell Behavior

Original post: Newswise - Substance Abuse Scientists Discover How Genetic Risk for Alcoholism Changes Brain Cell Behavior

Rutgers Health researchers have discovered that brain immune cells from people with a high genetic risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) behave differently than cells from low-risk people when exposed to alcohol.

Their study in Science Advances could help explain why some people are more susceptible to developing drinking problems and potentially lead to more personalized treatments.

“This is the first study to show how the genetic variations that increase the risk of AUD affect the behavior of some brain cells,” said Zhiping Pang, a professor of neuroscience and cell biology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and a resident scientist at the Child Health Institute of New Jersey and a core member at the Rutgers Brain Health Institute.

“We started with a simple model, but as the models get more complex, we’ll learn more about what’s happening in the brain,” said Pang, the senior author of the study. “Hopefully, our discoveries will suggest treatment approaches because we don’t currently have great treatments for AUD.”

According to the 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, nearly 28.9 million people ages 12 and older in the United States struggle with alcohol use disorder. While scientists have known the condition runs in families – with genetic factors accounting for 40% to 60% of risk – the biological mechanisms behind this hereditary component have remained unclear.

The research team took blood samples from two groups of people: those with both high genetic risk for AUD and diagnosed alcohol problems and those with low genetic risk and no alcohol problems. They transformed these blood cells into stem cells and made them develop into a type of brain-based immune cell called microglia.

They then exposed these two groups of cells, one from the people with a high genetic risk for AUD and one from the people with a low risk of AUD, to alcohol levels that mimicked those seen in the blood following alcohol use.

“The microglia with the high genetic risk scores were far more active than the microglia with the low genetic risk scores after the alcohol exposure,” said Xindi Li, lead author of the study, a postdoctoral fellow at the Child Health Institute of New Jersey.

The highly active cells engaged in more “synaptic pruning” – removing connections between neurons in the brain. This increased pruning activity could have significant implications, the researchers said.

“After many years of drinking, people with these genetics may have a greater risk of dementia because the microglia pruned so many more connections,” Li said. “Their overactivity could make neurons less functional.”

The study drew on expertise throughout Rutgers University, involving scientists from multiple labs and departments, including Ronald Hart and Jay Tischfield. This interdisciplinary approach brings together experts in genetics, neuroscience, and addiction research to tackle the complex challenge of understanding how genetic risk factors influence alcohol use disorder at the cellular level. This has been the long-term theme of the Rutgers component of the long-term NIH-funded Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA).

While previous studies have identified genetic variants associated with increased risk, it has been challenging to see how these differences affect brain cell function.

Although this study focused on a single type of brain cell in a flat environment, the team is developing more sophisticated models for their research.

“We’re going from the cell cultures in a 2D situation to the brain organoids,” Pang said. “So we can study something more like a mini brain-structure, to understand how the cells interact with alcohol, and then to see how the genetic risk factors play a role in that response.”

This work could eventually lead to better treatments for alcohol use disorder. The results suggest that if different genetic variations lead to different cell behavior in the brain, people with different genetic signatures may need different treatments, for example targeting the microglia in some people at high risk.

That said, the researchers stressed that much work remains to be done to translate these cellular findings into clinical applications.

Standardizing Provider Assessments Reveals Important Information About Gun and Opioid Access for Veterans at Risk of Suicide

About Newswise

Journalists use Newswise as a source for research news, experts, ready-to-use content and story ideas. Media relations professionals can connect with reporters and share their organization’s news with a wider audience. Public readers discover the latest research news in science, medicine, social sciences, environment, technology, factchecks and business news from the world’s most credible universities and research organizations. More than 7,000 email wires go to journalists from more than 2,400 media outlets around the globe.

Contact Us
Signup

Social Network, Social Functioning Associated with Longer Stays in Alcohol Treatment

Newswise — When seeking treatment for alcohol use disorder, how a person is functioning in society strongly influences how long they will stay in inpatient treatment. According to a study published in Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research, people who are dissatisfied in their primary social role—at work or school, for example—and people with a strong social network stay in treatment longer, giving them more opportunities for therapeutic intervention. The study highlights the importance of helping people in treatment for alcohol use disorder to strengthen their social network and social role.

The purpose of the study was to examine the modifiable factors affecting how long a patient stays in inpatient treatment for alcohol use disorder. Longer duration of stay is considered to be more beneficial to patients. Researchers collected data on 800 people being admitted to a short-term inpatient facility center in greater New York City between 2022 and 2024 to treat their alcohol and substance use disorders.

Sixty-five percent of participants used alcohol as their primary substance. The average length of stay in treatment ranged from two days to 43 days. A preliminary analysis found that total well-being, symptom distress, social role, total social network size, and alcohol use severity were significant predictors of length of stay; those factors were further analyzed. The preliminary analysis did not find an association between age, sex, race, ethnicity, or substance use disorder severity and length of stay.  

Further analysis found that social role, social network size, and severity of alcohol use disorder all significantly increased length of stay. Specifically, for each additional point on the social role measure, the length of stay increased by 0.12 days. This scale measures the individual’s satisfaction with what they consider to be their primary social role, whether in a work, school, volunteer, or other setting. The higher the number on this scale, which ranges from 9 to 45, the more dysfunctional the person’s social role. Individuals generally dissatisfied with their social role may be more inclined to stay in treatment to improve their function in those roles—or may be required to do so by their school or workplace.

Each of the three additional people listed in a patient’s social network was associated with an increased length of stay in treatment of one day. This result aligns with prior studies and may be because a larger social network means more support during treatment and more motivation to stay in treatment. The study also found that for every three additional alcohol use disorder symptoms a participant reported, their length of stay increased by one day.

The authors recommend further research at other treatment facilities and note that the study findings provide important insights for clinicians who can easily incorporate the social functioning measures used in the study into intake processes and communications among treatment teams, for example, through electronic health records. They recommend that treatment aims to improve the patient’s social functioning during treatment and after discharge, for instance, through vocational rehabilitation, and that clinicians leverage patients’ social networks to support their treatment and recovery. 

Correlates of length of stay in a short-term inpatient residential addiction treatment facility. J. Bourdon, S. Verdecanna, J. Wright, N. Vadhan, M.F. Wright, J. Morgenstern

ACER-24-6126.R2

Virginia Tech Researchers Ask How Many Attempts It Takes to Quit Substance Abuse

Original post: Newswise - Substance Abuse Virginia Tech Researchers Ask How Many Attempts It Takes to Quit Substance Abuse

BYLINE: Leigh Anne Kelley

Relapse is common when someone is trying to quit, regardless of whether they’re giving up opioids or alcohol or cigarettes.

To better inform treatment, researchers with the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC’s Addiction Recovery Research Center wanted to better understand how the experience of quitting differed across substances. 

“When we talk about intervention for addiction, we know that we are far from the ideal model of treatment,” said Rafaela Fontes, a research scientist at the institute and first author on the study “Beyond the first try: How many quit attempts are necessary to achieve substance use cessation?”

For the study, “quitting” was based on a yes or no response to a survey question that asked whether participants still used a specific substance. Researchers noted that because substance use is a chronically relapsing disorder, the number of quit attempts reported might not be final, although for all participants across all substances, the average time in abstinence was more than seven years.

The work, scheduled for publication in the Feb. 1 issue of Drug and Alcohol Dependence, found that:

  • Substance use disorder is a chronically relapsing condition that often requires multiple quit attempts before successful abstinence.
  • The number of quit attempts varies by substance, with opioids and pain medication requiring significantly more attempts than all other substances.
  • Hallucinogens are less challenging to quit, requiring fewer attempts.
  • People who meet the criteria of having a more severe or longer history of substance use disorder might need more attempts before achieving abstinence.

“We treat addiction as an acute disorder, even though we know that it is a chronically relapsing condition,” Fontes said. “When we’re talking about addiction, we need to understand that it’s not one size fits all. There are some substances that are harder to quit than others and it’s not equally easy or equally hard for everyone. We cannot use the same strategy for everything because it might not work.”

The findings suggest that early intervention improves success and reduces relapses, according to Allison Tegge, corresponding author on the study and a research associate professor at institute.

“What makes this research stand out is that, not only did we consider the substance, but we asked additional questions to look at the individual experience in context,” Tegge said.

What they did

Researchers recruited study participants from the International Quit & Recovery Registry, a tool created to advance scientific understanding of success in overcoming addiction. Sponsored by the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, it was developed by Professor Warren Bickel, an addiction expert who died in September. Bickel was an author and principal investigator on the substance use cessation research.

“These findings highlight the relevance of the registry and the work started by Dr. Bickel to understand addiction recovery,” Fontes said. “He was a visionary, and his registry continues to help us gain a deeper and better understanding of recovery trajectories.”

The study ultimately drew its findings from 344 registry participants who completed surveys on the substances they had used, the age of first use, the number of quit attempts, and current substance use. Only participants who reported successful abstinence from at least one substance were included.

Participants were asked which they had used 10 or more times: nicotine, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, opioids, stimulants, prescription pain relievers, hallucinogens, anesthetics, tranquilizers, inhalants, or “other.” They also were asked about length and severity of use, based on criteria from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

What they found

Participants reported more difficulty quitting pain medication and opioids, substances with high relapse rates and for which short-term treatment effectiveness is low. Both alcohol and stimulants had more quit attempts than cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, and nicotine.

Hallucinogens, which have a different clinical profile than other commonly misused substances, required fewer quit attempts. Researchers also found that tranquilizers had a substantially higher number of quit attempts than hallucinogens.

Notably, substances with a higher number of quit attempts were also those that can bring on severe physical symptoms of withdrawal, such as pain, nausea, and anxiety.

The researchers hope their work informs treatment, with a goal of avoiding high rates of relapse and readmission. “This information can help provide the necessary support for someone moving through recovery,” Tegge said.

Why it matters

The research corroborates the chronic nature of substance use disorder and expands on previous research by showing that the number of quit attempts varies depending on the substance.

Additionally, recognizing that it takes multiple attempts, and understanding how some substances may be more challenging to quit than others, is the first step. “If people in recovery knew the average number of attempts it might take to quit a particular drug, rather than see relapse as a failure they might view it as a step on the journey,” Tegge said. “Understanding that relapse is part of recovery can help people stay engaged.”

The challenges of substances’ physiological effects combined with individual circumstances allows treatment providers to create personalized plans. Knowing different factors that affect relapse can help inform interventions. 

In addition to helping inform providers, Fontes also hopes it helps people who are trying to quit. “Maybe they can see that failure is part of the process,” she said, “and think: ‘I just need to keep trying, and eventually I’m going to get there.’”

Authors

  • Rafaela Fontes, research scientist, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC
  • Allison Tegge, research associate professor, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC and Department of Basic Science Education, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine
  • Roberta Freitas-Lemos, assistant professor, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC and Department of Psychology, College of Science
  • Daniel Cabral, postdoctoral associate, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC
  • Warren Bickel, professor, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC; Department of Psychology, College of Science; and psychiatry and behavioral medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine

DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112525

To participate in this research

  • Complete the questionnaire to see if you qualify to participate in the International Quit & Recovery Registry. Research is conducted online; the registry is worldwide.
  • If you live near Roanoke, consider participating in one of the Addiction Recovery Research Center’s studies. Complete the confidential online screening to see if you are eligible.

Researchers Track Sharp Increase in Diagnoses for Sedative, Hypnotic and Anxiety Use Disorder in Young Adults

Newswise — The prevalence of diagnosed disorders from recurrent use of sedative, hypnotic and antianxiety medications in adolescents and young adults has increased sharply since 2001, according to Rutgers Health researchers. 

Their study, published in Addiction, examined diagnoses of these disorders in adolescents and young adults between 2001 to 2019.

Sedative, hypnotic and antianxiety medications are used to treat a variety of conditions, including sleep and anxiety disorders. According to Harvard Health, consistent use of these drugs can lead to a higher tolerance for their effects, meaning patients require higher doses to achieve the intended effects.

For some, a problematic pattern of use of these medications can lead to significant impairment and distress. When this happens, patients may be diagnosed with sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic use disorders, which are estimated to impact 2.2 million Americans, according to data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

Using national Medicaid data from nearly 7 million adolescents and young adults in 2001 and 13 million adolescents and young adults in 2019, Rutgers Health researchers looked at trends in sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic use disorder diagnoses. The prevalence increased threefold in adolescents and increased fivefold in young adults from 2001 to 2019.

“The increase in diagnoses of these disorders may be due to changes in the availability, use and misuse of sedatives, hypnotics and anxiolytics, as well as an increase in detection, awareness and diagnosing of these disorders,” said Greta Bushnell, an assistant professor at the Rutgers Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science (PETS) and lead author of the study.

Sedative, hypnotic and anti-anxiety medications are accessed in number of ways, including through medical prescriptions as well as through nonmedical sources such as a friend or in a medicine cabinet. Researchers found the prevalence of a sedative, hypnotic, or anxiolytic use disorders to be elevated in youths with prescriptions. However, the majority of adolescents and young adults diagnosed with a sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic use disorder didn’t have a prescription for one of those medications.

“Efforts to target nonmedical use of these drugs is important as a means to reduce this disorder,” said Bushnell, who also is an assistant professor of epidemiology at Rutgers School of Public Health, “as is cautious prescribing in this young population.”

Researchers also found that most adolescents and young adults with sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic use disorders had another comorbid substance use disorder diagnosis; in adolescents, cannabis use disorder was the most common and opioid use disorder in young adults. 

“While sedative, hypnotic and anxiolytic use disorders are less common than other substance use disorders, it warrants attention from clinicians and researchers given treatment difficulties and the association with other substance use issues,” Bushnell said.

Examining trends in youth diagnosed with this disorder can lead to a better understanding of the population and improve support through care and resources, say researchers.

Coauthors of the study include Kristen Lloyd and Tobias Gerhard of PETS and Rutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research; Katherine Keyes, Mark Olfson and Deborah Hasin of Columbia University; and Magdalena Cerdá of New York University.

Study Finds Strong Negative Associations with Teenagers in AI Models

A couple of years ago, Robert Wolfe was experimenting with an artificial intelligence system. He wanted it to complete the sentence, “The teenager ____ at school.” Wolfe, a University of Washington doctoral student in the Information School, had expected something mundane, something that most teenagers do regularly — perhaps “studied.” But the model plugged in “died.”

This shocking response led Wolfe and a UW team to study how AI systems portray teens. The researchers looked at two common, open-source AI systems trained in English and one trained in Nepali. They wanted to compare models trained on data from different cultures, and co-lead author Aayushi Dangol, a UW doctoral student in human centered design and engineering, grew up in Nepal and is a native Nepali speaker.

In the English-language systems, around 30% of the responses referenced societal problems such as violence, drug use and mental illness. The Nepali system produced fewer negative associations in responses, closer to 10% of all answers. Finally, the researchers held workshops with groups of teens from the U.S. and Nepal, and found that neither group felt that an AI system trained on media data containing stereotypes about teens would accurately represent teens in their cultures.

The team presented its research Oct. 22 at the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics and Society in San Jose.

“We found that the way teens viewed themselves and the ways the systems often portrayed them were completely uncorrelated,” said co-lead author Wolfe. “For instance, the way teens continued the prompts we gave AI models were incredibly mundane. They talked about video games and being with their friends, whereas the models brought up things like committing crimes and bullying.”

The team studied OpenAI’s GPT-2, the last open-source version of the system that underlies ChatGPT; Meta’s LLaMA-2, another popular open-source system; and DistilGPT2 Nepali, a version of GPT-2 trained on Nepali text. Researchers prompted the systems to complete sentences such as “At the party, the teenager _____” and “The teenager worked because they wanted_____.”

The researchers also looked at static word embeddings — a method of representing a word as a series of numbers and calculating the likelihood of it occurring with certain other words in large text datasets — to find what terms were most associated with “teenager” and its synonyms. Out of 1,000 words from one model, 50% were negative.

The researchers concluded that the systems’ skewed portrayal of teenagers came in part from the abundance of negative media coverage about teens; in some cases, the models studied cited media as the source of their outputs. News stories are seen as “high-quality” training data, because they’re often factual, but they frequently focus on negative stories, not the quotidian parts of most teens’ lives.

“There’s a deep need for big changes in how these models are trained,” said senior author Alexis Hiniker, a UW associate professor in the Information School. “I would love to see some sort of community-driven training that comes from a lot of different people, so that teens’ perspectives and their everyday experiences are the initial source for training these systems, rather than the lurid topics that make news headlines.”

To compare the AI outputs to the lives of actual teens, researchers recruited 13 American and 18 Nepalese teens for workshops. They asked the participants to write words that came to mind about teenagers, to rate 20 words on how well they describe teens and to complete the prompts given to the AI models. The similarities between the AI systems’ responses and the teens’ were limited. The two groups of teens differed, however, in how they wanted to see fairer representations of teens in AI systems.

“Reliable AI needs to be culturally responsive,” Wolfe said. “Within our two groups, the U.S. teens were more concerned with diversity — they didn’t want to be presented as one unit. The Nepalese teens suggested that AI should try to present them more positively.”

The authors note that, because they were studying open-source systems, the models studied aren’t the most current versions — GPT-2 dates to 2019, while the LLAMA model is from 2023. Chatbots, such as ChatGPT, built on later versions of these systems typically undergo further training and have guardrails in place to protect against such overt bias.

“Some of the more recent models have fixed some of the explicit toxicity,” Wolfe said. “The danger, though, is that those upstream biases we found here can persist implicitly and affect the outputs as these systems become more integrated into peoples’ lives, as they get used in schools or as people ask what birthday present to get for their 14-year-old nephew. Those responses are influenced by how the model was initially trained, regardless of the safeguards we later install.”

Bill Howe, a UW associate professor in the Information School, is a co-author on this paper. This research was funded in part by the Connecting the EdTech Research EcoSystem research network.

For more information, contact Wolfe at [email protected] and Hinkier at [email protected].

UTEP Researchers Secure $2.8M NIH Grant to Advance Understanding of Addiction-Related Decision-Making

EL PASO, Texas (Jan. 16, 2025) – Researchers at The University of Texas at El Paso have been awarded a $2.8 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to explore the neurobiological mechanisms behind drug-taking behaviors and addiction.

The study will focus on striosomes, clusters of cells within the brain that play a pivotal role in decision-making, and will seek to address a critical issue: understanding how drugs of abuse impact decision-making processes and how these changes can drive costly and self-destructive behaviors.

“Striosomes appear to act as a gating mechanism for cortical signals related to dopamine, a neurotransmitter that is closely linked with reward-motivated behavior,” explained Alexander Friedman, Ph.D., the grant’s principal investigator and assistant professor in UTEP’s Department of Biological Sciences. “In individuals with substance use disorders, we believe this gating function is disrupted, which may explain why they continue pursuing drugs despite high costs.”

Substance use disorders remain a pressing public health crisis in the United States, with overdoses continuing to rank among the leading causes of death among adults, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A hallmark of these disorders is the persistent pursuit of drugs, regardless of the often significant personal, financial, and social costs involved. While existing computational models have provided valuable insights into drug consumption and craving, they have largely ignored the role of cost in decision-making — an omission this project aims to rectify, said Friedman.

The study combines experimental work using animal models with the development of an advanced computational neurobiological model. Such models allow researchers to simulate and test hypotheses about how neurological processes influence behavior, offering tools to better understand the intricate relationship between drug use, decision-making, and neural activity.

Travis Moschak, Ph.D., assistant professor and co-principal investigator, highlighted the interdisciplinary nature of the project: “This study is a synthesis of behavioral neuroscience and computational biology. We’re not only exploring how drugs affect brain activity but also how this activity translates into real-world behaviors. It’s a critical step toward bridging basic science and practical applications.”

The project will involve extensive collaboration and student engagement. Friedman leads one of the largest research teams at UTEP, including 10 graduate students. Moschak’s lab will contribute an additional three graduate students, all of whom will be funded through the NIH grant.

“This grant represents an incredible opportunity for our students to contribute to groundbreaking research while gaining hands-on experience in the lab,” said Friedman. “Many of them are already deeply involved in the experimental and computational aspects of this study, and their contributions are invaluable.”

The study is part of a larger effort at UTEP to advance foundational research that can lead to real-world applications. Friedman emphasized the importance of this sort of translational research, which focuses on turning scientific discoveries into practical treatments such as medications or therapies to address addiction and prevent relapse in individuals.

“With additional financial support for translational research, the time it takes to develop new treatments could be significantly reduced — from decades to much less,” Friedman noted. “This kind of funding — which often comes from private entities — is crucial for ensuring that our findings have a direct impact on people’s lives.”

“We are incredibly proud of Dr. Friedman, Dr. Moschak, and their teams for securing this prestigious grant,” said Robert A. Kirken, Ph.D., dean of UTEP’s College of Science. “Their work exemplifies the impactful research happening at UTEP, and it aligns perfectly with our mission of serving the community. This study has the potential to transform lives, and we are deeply grateful for their efforts.”

About The University of Texas at El Paso

The University of Texas at El Paso is America’s leading Hispanic-serving university. Located at the westernmost tip of Texas, where three states and two countries converge along the Rio Grande, 84% of our 25,000 students are Hispanic, and more than half are the first in their families to go to college. UTEP offers 171 bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degree programs at the only open-access, top-tier research university in America.

Preventing Substance-Use Disorders in Teenagers

Original post: Newswise - Substance Abuse Preventing Substance-Use Disorders in Teenagers

A new randomized controlled trial involving experimental and control groups in Canada has demonstrated the effectiveness of a brief cognitive-behavioral intervention program in reducing substance use disorders (SUDs) in adolescents.

Published yesterday in the American Journal of Psychiatry, the study shows that students who attended two 90-minute workshops in the first year of high school had significantly fewer problems with drugs and alcohol by the time they graduated.

The study was led by Patricia Conrod, a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Addictology at Université de Montréal and researcher at CHU Sainte-Justine, the university’s affiliated children’s hospital.

3,800 students involved

Conrod and her research team followed 3,800 students in 31 schools in the Greater Montreal area between 2012 and 2017, from Grades 7 to 11. Some of the schools offered the PreVenture program to Grade 7 students deemed at risk based on their results on a questionnaire which assessed four personality traits: impulsivity, thrill-seeking, anxiety sensitivity and hopelessness.

Statistical analyses of the results showed an increase in SUDs in all schools between Grades 7 and 11, and found that 10 per cent of the students met the diagnostic criteria for these disorders by the end of high school. In those who followed the workshops, however, the increase was much less pronounced.

Depending on the year analyzed, the risk of developing SUDs was reduced by 23 to 80 per cent among the students who did the workshops, compared to those who did not.

“With just two 90-minute workshops, the program was able to protect young people against the risk of long-term substance use disorders,” said Conrod, who also holds the Canada Research Chair in Preventive Mental Health and Addiction. “This is particularly promising in the current context of North America’s addiction crisis.”

The PreVenture program is today offered in schools in five Canadian provinces as well as in 12 U.S. states. The interventions help young people explore individual differences in personality traits and the coping strategies they can use to help manage their personality. In the workshops, they also learn about cognitive and behavioural strategies that will help them to channel key personality traits towards long-term goals.

“Individual differences in personality are essential to a healthy and diversified society,” said Conrod. “However, when certain personality traits are mismanaged, some young people will turn to substances to temporarily reduce the stress they feel. By teaching them other, more effective strategies in early adolescence, we can help them better manage everyday challenges.”

“Prevention is one of the most effective and rewarding measures when it comes to drug use among young people,” said Julie Bruneau, an UdeM professor of family medicine who holds the Canada Research Chair in Addiction Medicine and is scientific director of the Quebec arm of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Matters.

“This study provides robust, clear Quebec data that can be translated into concrete action,” Bruneau said. “It’s invaluable, and gives us hope that this intervention will soon be available to all young people in Quebec.”