Government of Canada Invests in National Coordination and Indigenous-Led Research on Effective Substance Use Interventions

BYLINE: Government of Canada invests in national coordination and Indigenous-led research on effective substance use interventions

Newswise — Research plays a crucial role in understanding the complexities of substance use, guiding effective interventions, and ultimately saving lives. That’s why we must leverage Canada’s exceptional research talent and expertise to ensure our substance use health interventions, services, and policies are effective, equitable, and evidence-informed.

Today, the Honourable Ya’ara Saks, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health, announced an investment of $6 million through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canadian Drugs and Substances Strategy (CDSS) to expand and increase the impact of the Canadian Research Initiative on Substance Matters (CRISM). This new funding includes $4 million to create a Network Coordinating Centre and $2 million to develop an Indigenous Engagement Platform that will work collaboratively across the research network.

Dr. David Hodgins at the University of Calgary will lead the CRISM Network Coordinating Centre. Dr. Hodgins and his team will establish four core platforms, including one to co-create knowledge mobilization products and activities with stakeholders and partners, and a training and capacity building platform that includes research placements and scholarships as well as mentorship opportunities for early career researchers and Indigenous scholars across all network nodes. The Network Coordinating Centre will also facilitate a trials and project support platform to facilitate clinical trials, research studies and data sharing, and a platform to create processes and tools for the production of guidelines and best practice documents.

Dr. Robert Henry at the University of Saskatchewan will lead the development of the CRISM Indigenous Engagement Platform. Using distinctions-based and community-led approaches, Dr. Henry and his team will strengthen and increase Indigenous involvement across CRISM’s regional nodes by advising the Network Coordinating Centre on Indigenous research priorities, improving Indigenous engagement at all levels, and supporting CRISM to improve Indigenous health and well-being through Indigenous-driven efforts. The platform will include five core pillars: knowledge translation and mobilization, training of Indigenous students, Indigenous research priorities designed with Indigenous community partners, improving Indigenous methodologies for CRISM, and development of an Indigenous evaluation framework.

Supported by the Network Coordinating Centre and Indigenous Engagement Platform, CRISM’s network of over a thousand service providers, researchers, policy makers, patients, and people who use substances will work together to develop impactful, evidence-informed approaches to prevent and treat substance-related harms.

Quotes

“Substance use is complex and there is no one-size-fits-all solution to preventing or reducing harms. We need to leverage research and data across the country to improve our understanding of substance use issues and shape evidence-based policies that offer real solutions and support those in need.”

The Honourable Ya’ara Saks
Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health

“CRISM is a prime example of what’s possible when researchers are empowered to self-organize and improve policy and practice from the bottom up. These platforms will amplify the already impactful work of CRISM, ensuring the network’s continued success addressing critical substance use issues impacting individuals, families and communities across Canada.”

Dr. Samuel Weiss
Scientific Director, CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction

“The sum is greater than the whole of its parts! The unique strength of CRISM is that the perspectives of researchers, policy makers, frontline service providers, our Indigenous partners, and people with lived and living experience come together to help develop solid evidence-based solutions to the challenges of addiction. This additional funding will support our five geographic nodes in working together in generating and sharing new information.”

Dr. David Hodgins
Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary

“Addressing the disproportionate experiences to substance use of Indigenous Peoples requires a concerted effort that provides opportunities for Indigenous Peoples, communities, researchers, knowledge keepers, youth, and those with living/lived experience to come together to inform broader research initiatives, programs, and knowledge mobilization outcomes. The CRISM Indigenous Engagement Platform (IEP) will provide opportunities for continued efforts to address the past, while looking to the future, while respecting Indigenous ways of knowing.”

Dr. Robert Henry
Assistant Professor, Department of Indigenous Studies, University of Saskatchewan and Nominated Principal Investigator, Saskatchewan Network Environment for Indigenous Health Research

Quick facts

  • The Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Matters (CRISM) – formerly the Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse – was established in 2015 by CIHR to build a national network in substance use research consisting of researchers, service providers, policy makers, and people with lived experience of substance use.

  • This cross-Canada research network is composed of five regional nodes located in British Columbia, Prairies, Ontario, Quebec, and the Atlantic region.

  • CRISM provides a flexible and expandable platform for accelerating the development of local and pan-Canadian research and knowledge mobilization on substance use, including on prevention, harm reduction, and treatment.

  • CIHR is providing $6 million in new funding to strengthen and expand CRISM’s activities across Canada with a new Network Coordinating Centre and Indigenous Engagement Platform.

Brain neurotransmitter receptor antagonist found to prevent opioid addiction in mice

Newswise — New research led by UCLA Health has found a drug that treats insomnia works to prevent the addictive effects of the morphine opioids in mice while still providing effective pain relief.  

The study, published in the journal Nature Mental Health, concluded that suvorexant, which blocks brain receptors for a neurotransmitter called hypocretin, prevents opioid addiction. At high doses in humans, suvorexant induces sleep and is used to treat insomnia. But sleep was not induced, and behavioral alertness was maintained, at the much lower doses effective in preventing opioid addiction in mice. 

Hypocretin, also called orexin, is a peptide that is linked to mood, with hypocretin release in humans being maximal during pleasurable activities and minimal during pain or sadness. The loss of hypocretin neurons is the cause of narcolepsy, which is thought to be an autoimmune disease. People with narcolepsy and mice made narcoleptic have a greatly diminished susceptibility to opiate addiction.  

Researchers have found both humans addicted to heroin and mice addicted to morphine develop higher numbers of hypocretin producing neurons. Morphine causes hypocretin neurons to increase their anatomical connections to pleasure related brain regions. 

The latest study in mice found that administering opioids with suvorexant prevents opioid-induced changes in hypocretin neurons, prevents hypocretin neurons from increasing their connections to the brain’s reward related regions, greatly reduces opioid induced brain inflammation and prevents addictive behavior, such as running in mice expecting to receive their daily morphine dose. Suvorexant given with morphine also greatly reduces morphine withdrawal symptoms, according to the study. 

“The annual US rate of opioid overdose deaths now exceeds 80,000, greater than the annual rates of automobile or gun deaths,” said the study’s senior author, Dr. Jerome Siegel of UCLA Health’s Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, the UCLA Brain Research Institute and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. “Non-opioid analgesics are able to relieve relatively minor pain. But severe burns, cancer, joint inflammation, sickle cell disease, bone damage and many other painful conditions often cannot be effectively treated with non-opioid analgesics.  

“Further studies are needed to determine if the addiction suppressive results seen in mice given suvorexant with morphine are also seen in humans, potentially allowing safer, more effective treatment of pain without the risk of addiction and opioid overdose death,” Siegel continued 

The study included 170 mice that were administered morphine for 14-day periods, 5 postmortem brains of humans with opiate use disorder and 5 control human brains. Trials are necessary to determine whether suvorexant will be as effective in suppressing addiction in humans using opioids for pain relief as it is in mice, Siegel said. 

“The annual US rate of opioid overdose deaths now exceeds 80,000, greater than the annual rates of automobile or gun deaths,” Siegel said. “Non-opioid analgesics are able to relieve relatively minor pain. But severe burns, cancer, joint inflammation, sickle cell disease, bone damage and many other painful conditions often cannot be effectively treated with non-opioid analgesics.  

“Further studies are needed to determine if the addiction suppressive results seen in mice given suvorexant with morphine are also seen in humans, potentially allowing safer, more effective treatment of pain without the risk of addiction and opioid overdose death,” Siegel continued 

Article Citation: McGregor R., Wu M.-F., Thannickal T.C., Li S., and Siegel J.M. (2024). Suvorexant blocks opiate induced anatomical and behavioral changes without diminishing opiate analgesia. Nature Mental Health, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00278-2 

 

Acupuncture reduces methadone dose and opioid cravings in patients undergoing methadone maintenance therapy

access_time

Embargo lifts in

This news release is embargoed until 8-Jul-2024 at 5:00 PM EDT.    (Not for public release) Uploaded on: 2-Jul-2024 2:00 PM EDT

This news release is available only to verified logged-in journalists until the embargo expires on 7/8/2024 5:00:00 PM. Professional journalists may apply for a PressPass to access embargoed stories.

Pennsylvania’s Opioid Prescriptions Plunge 38% After State Monitoring Program Implementation

Original post: Newswise - Substance Abuse Pennsylvania's Opioid Prescriptions Plunge 38% After State Monitoring Program Implementation

Newswise — A recent study reveals a dramatic 38% drop in opioid prescriptions in Pennsylvania since the implementation of “Prescription Drug Monitoring Program” (PDMP). As the opioid crisis continues to grip the nation, Pennsylvania’s data highlights the significant impact of regulatory measures on curbing opioid abuse, offering a potential model for other states battling similar epidemics.

The study titled “Opioid Prescribing Patterns by Drug Type: The Pennsylvania Experience” examines the changes in opioid prescribing patterns in Pennsylvania from 2016 to 2020 following the implementation of the PDMP. The study was organized by the Rothman Opioid Foundation.

“In 2016, nearly 2 million opioid prescriptions were given to patients across the state. However, by the end of the study period in 2020, there was a 38 percent decrease in opioid prescriptions written,” says Dr. Asif Ilyas, senior author of the study.  He is President of the Rothman Opioid Foundation in Philadelphia, a Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at Thomas Jefferson University, and an Associate Dean of Clinical Research at the Drexel University College of Medicine in Pennsylvania. Ilyas states that at last during its initial roll out, the PDMP has had an effect in the absolute number of opioids prescribed by Pennsylvania’s prescribers.

This reduction was observed across various types of opioids, with the largest decreases in the prescriptions of hydrocodone and oxycodone in absolute numbers. Despite the overall reduction in prescriptions, the composition of the types of opioids prescribed remained relatively consistent over the study period. Ilyas notes that continued analysis of opioid prescribing across the state as well as improvements to the PDMP is needed to order to maximize the PDMP’s effect to curb prescribing utilization in Pennsylvania.

Co-authors of the study include Brock Bakewell, Chaim Miller, and Matthew Sherman.  The study appears in The Journal of Opioid Management, March-April 2023.  A copy of the study can be found at : https://wmpllc.org/ojs/index.php/jom/article/view/3365

About the Rothman Institute Foundation for Opioid Research and Education.

The Rothman Orthopaedic Foundation, for short, is a non-profit 501c3 organization dedicated to raising awareness of the ongoing opioid crisis, educating physicians and patients on safe opioid prescribing and use – respectively, and advising policymakers on sound opioid and pain management policy. Most importantly, the Rothman Opioid Foundation performs and supports the highest quality research on opioids and alternative pain modalities to yield findings that can better inform patients, physicians, and the greater healthcare community in the most evidenced-based pain management strategies while working to mitigate opioid abuse and addiction.

Innovative Program May Reduce Substance Use Among Formerly Incarcerated Men

Original post: Newswise - Substance Abuse Innovative Program May Reduce Substance Use Among Formerly Incarcerated Men

Newswise — A new study led by Liliane Cambraia Windsor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work has shown significant reductions in alcohol and substance use among formerly incarcerated men through a unique combination of critical dialogue and capacity-building projects. This innovative approach, tested in a randomized clinical trial, offers new hope for communities struggling with high rates of substance use and its devastating consequences.

Key Findings

The study, conducted with 602 men with histories of substance use disorders (SUD) and incarceration, aimed to identify effective intervention components that reduce substance use. Researchers found that peer-delivered critical dialogue (CD) and capacity-building projects (CBP) were effective in reducing substance use when participants attended the sessions consistently.

Rationale for Testing Community Wise for Men with Histories of Incarceration and SUD

In the United States, most formerly incarcerated individuals self-identify as men. People released from incarceration often return to predominantly Black and historically marginalized communities that have been neglected by governments and private investments. This neglect results in insufficient social services and high rates of poverty, crime, and unemployment. The compounded effects of racism, classism, and heteronormative stereotypes of masculinity lead to elevated socioeconomic and health-related needs among these men, including disease prevention and health care, housing, and employment. 

Addressing Social Determinants of Health

Despite evidence suggesting that interventions to reduce health inequities must address social determinants of health (SDOH), most evidence-based substance use disorder (SUD) interventions focus solely on changing individual behavior. This study, however, utilized critical consciousness (CC) theory, which promotes critical reflection on one’s social, political, and economic conditions and encourages civic engagement. This approach has been shown to reduce the impact of SDOH myriad health outcomes. 

Study Design and Analysis

This study was designed to develop an optimized intervention for decreasing alcohol and substance use (ASU) among men with a history of SUD and incarceration. The group conducted a 24 full factorial experiment to evaluate the individual and interactive effects of four intervention components on ASU reduction. Due to low attendance across the 15 sessions of Community Wise, the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis did not fully meet the a priori component selection criteria. Consequently, a modified ITT analysis was conducted to control for intervention attendance. This analysis supported the inclusion of CD and CBP as viable intervention components and identified trained peer facilitators (TPFs) as efficient and effective facilitators.

The Intervention

Participants were assigned to different groups receiving combinations of the following:

  • Critical Dialogue (CD): Six weekly two-hour group sessions discussing societal and personal issues.
  • Quality of Life Wheel (QLW): Six weekly one-hour group sessions focusing on improving life satisfaction.
  • Capacity Building Projects (CBP): Six weekly one-hour group sessions where participants worked on community projects.
  • Facilitators: Sessions were led by either trained peers or licensed professionals.

Results

After accounting for attendance rates, the study revealed that peer-delivered CD and CBP sessions significantly reduced substance use over five months. This approach not only provided support but also empowered participants to take active roles in their recovery and community improvement. CD combined with CBP, delivered by TPFs, is the optimized Community Wise format for subsequent research.

Future Directions

Building on these promising results, the researchers plan to:

  • Improve session attendance rates.
  • Test the optimized intervention against standard of treatment in broader community settings.
  • Develop strategies for effective implementation in various populations.
  • Conduct further research to examine community-level outcomes, such as community cohesion and successful completion of capacity-building projects.
  • Investigate the potential impacts of facilitator type and demographic characteristics on ASU.

Conclusion 

This study highlights the importance of community involvement and peer support in addressing substance use disorders. The optimized intervention, costing approximately $138 per person, presents a cost-effective, scalable solution with the potential for substantial impact. The research underscores the need to address systemic issues such as racism, classism, and sexism as part of SUD treatment.

About the Study 

This research was a collaborative effort between community members and scientists, ensuring the intervention was culturally relevant and community-driven. The study’s success underscores the power of combining scientific rigor with community-based participatory research principles.

###

Windsor, L. C., Benoit, E., Lee, C., Jemal, A., Kugler, K., Smith, D. C., Musaad, S. (2024). Critical Dialogue and Capacity-Building Projects Reduced Alcohol and Substance Use in a Randomized Clinical Trial Among Formerly Incarcerated Men. Substance Use & Misuse, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2352611

Experimental drug supercharges medicine that reverses opioid overdose

Newswise — The ongoing opioid epidemic in the U.S. kills tens of thousands of people every year. Naloxone, sold under the brand name Narcan, has saved countless lives by reversing opioid overdoses. But new and more powerful opioids keep appearing, and first responders are finding it increasingly difficult to revive people who overdose.

Now, researchers have found an approach that could extend naloxone’s lifesaving power, even in the face of ever-more-dangerous opioids. A team of researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Stanford University and the University of Florida have identified potential drugs that make naloxone more potent and longer lasting, capable of reversing the effects of opioids in mice at low doses without worsening withdrawal symptoms. The study is published July 3 in Nature.

“Naloxone is a lifesaver, but it’s not a miracle drug; it has limitations,” said co-senior author Susruta Majumdar, PhD, a professor of anesthesiology at Washington University. “Many people who overdose on opioids need more than one dose of naloxone before they are out of danger. This study is a proof of concept that we can make naloxone work better — last longer and be more potent — by giving it in combination with a molecule that influences the responses of the opioid receptor.”

Opioids such as oxycodone and fentanyl work by slipping inside a pocket on the opioid receptor, which is found primarily on neurons in the brain. The presence of opioids activates the receptor, setting off a cascade of molecular events that temporarily alters how the brain functions: reducing the perception of pain, inducing a sense of euphoria and slowing down breathing. It is this suppression of breathing that makes opioids so deadly.

The molecular compound described in the paper is a so-called negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of the opioid receptor. Allosteric modulators are a hot area of research in pharmacology, because they offer a way to influence how the body responds to drugs by fine-tuning the activity of drug receptors rather than the drugs themselves. Co-author Vipin Rangari, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the Majumdar lab, did the experiments to chemically characterize the compound.

Naloxone is an opioid, but unlike other opioids, its presence in the binding pocket doesn’t activate the receptor. This unique feature gives naloxone the power to reverse overdoses by displacing problematic opioids from the pocket, thereby deactivating the opioid receptor. The problem is that naloxone wears off before other opioids do. For example, naloxone works for about two hours, while fentanyl can stay in the bloodstream for eight hours. Once naloxone falls out of the binding pocket, any fentanyl molecules that are still circulating can re-attach to and re-activate the receptor, causing the overdose symptoms to return.

The research team — led by co-senior authors Majumdar; Brian K. Kobilka, PhD, a professor of molecular and cellular physiology at Stanford University; and Jay P. McLaughlin, PhD, a professor of pharmacodynamics at the University of Florida — set out to find NAMs that strengthen naloxone by helping it stay in the binding pocket longer and suppress the activation of the opioid receptor more effectively.

To do so, they screened a library of 4.5 billion molecules in the lab in search of molecules that bound to the opioid receptor with naloxone already tucked into the receptor’s pocket. Compounds representing several molecular families passed the initial screen, with one of the most promising dubbed compound 368. Further experiments in cells revealed that, in the presence of compound 368, naloxone was 7.6 times more effective at inhibiting the activation of the opioid receptor, partly because naloxone stayed in the binding pocket at least 10 times longer.

“The compound itself doesn’t bind well without naloxone,” said Evan O’Brien, PhD, the lead author on the study and a postdoctoral scholar in Kobilka’s lab at Stanford. “We think naloxone has to bind first, and then compound 368 is able to come in and cap it in place.”

Even better, compound 368 improved naloxone’s ability to counteract opioid overdoses in mice and enabled naloxone to reverse the effects of fentanyl and morphine at 1/10th the usual doses.

However, people who overdose on opioids and are revived with naloxone can experience withdrawal symptoms such as pain, chills, vomiting and irritability. In this study, while the addition of compound 368 boosted naloxone’s potency, it did not worsen the mice’s withdrawal symptoms.

“We have a long way to go, but these results are really exciting,” McLaughlin said. “Opioid withdrawal likely won’t kill you, but they’re so severe that users often resume taking opioids within a day or two to stop the symptoms. The idea that we can rescue patients from overdose with reduced withdrawal might just help a lot of people.”

Compound 368 is just one of several molecules that show potential as NAMs of the opioid receptor. The researchers have filed a patent on the NAMs, and are working on narrowing down and characterizing the most promising candidates. Majumdar estimates that it will be 10 to 15 years before a naloxone-enhancing NAM is brought to market.

“Developing a new drug is a very long process, and in the meantime new synthetic opioids are just going to keep on coming and getting more and more potent, which means more and more deadly,” Majumdar said. “Our hope is that by developing a NAM, we can preserve naloxone’s power to serve as an antidote, no matter what kind of opioids emerge in the future.”

O’Brien ES, Rangari VA, El Daibani A, Eans SO, Hammond HR, White E, Wang H, Shiimura Y, Kumar KK, Jiang Q, Appourchaux K, Huang W, Zhang C, Kennedy BJ, Mathiesen JM, Che T, McLaughlin JP, Majumdar S, Kobilka BK. Negative allosteric modulation of the μ-opioid receptor. Nature. July 3, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07587-7

The Supreme Court blocks Sackler Family Immunity

Newswise — The U.S. Supreme Court has blocked the Sackler family’s bid for immunity from opioid-related lawsuits in a landmark decision. This ruling marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing opioid crisis, potentially reshaping how litigation against pharmaceutical companies is handled nationwide. It underscores the accountability of the Sacklers for their role in the epidemic and ensures that settlement funds are directed to support affected communities. This decision highlights the importance of justice and reparations for those impacted by opioid addiction.

The Supreme Court’s decision is crucial as it sets a precedent for future opioid litigation and the distribution of settlement funds.

The media is actively covering this significant decision, reflecting the widespread interest and its potential impact. Notable coverage includes:

Newswise Research

Cost may not keep many people from filling opioid addiction treatment prescriptions

Exploitation of supply chain monitoring loopholes fueled US opioid epidemic, study finds

Newswise Experts

Deborah A. Pasko, PharmD, MHA

Cheryl Healton, DrPH, 

Stephen Crystal, PhD

Larissa Mooney, MD

Dr. Ty Schepis, Ph.D., Clinical Psychology

Call for Experts

If you have comments or research to contribute to Newswise, please email us at [email protected].

UNC Health Researchers Present Preliminary Data on Weight Loss Drugs on Alcohol Addiction

Newswise — CHAPEL HILL, N.C.Christian Hendershot, PhD, associate professor of psychiatry and director of the Clinical and Translational Addiction Research Program at the UNC School of Medicine, recently presented early findings from the first completed randomized controlled trial of semaglutide in participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD).

The preliminary and unpublished findings, which were presented at the Research Society on Alcohol’s Annual Meeting, showed a reduction in heavy drinking and drinking quantity among those who were given semaglutide versus the placebo group.

“We believe these findings are promising and warrant further trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists in treatment-seeking participants with alcohol use disorder,” said Hendershot, who is also a member of the Bowles Center for Alcohols Studies at the UNC School of Medicine.

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) was originally formulated to treat diabetes and has emerged as a weight loss drug. Anecdotal observations from patients have suggested the drug may also reduce alcohol and other substance cravings. This possibility is also consistent with numerous preclinical studies over the past decade, which led Hendershot and other groups to design early randomized clinical trials of GLP-1RAs in participants with AUD.

Participants in the Phase II randomized controlled trial were non-treatment-seeking volunteers who reported symptoms of alcohol use disorder. A total of 48 participants were randomized to medication or placebo groups. Participants assigned to the medication arm received the lower two clinical doses of semaglutide (0.25mg/week, 0.5mg/week) over approximately 2 months. The study was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA).

Preliminary results from the trial indicate that those taking the medication experienced greater reductions in drinking quantity and heavy drinking more than those in the placebo group. Given the magnitude of the effects at relatively lower doses, it appears that semaglutide could have the potential to reduce drinking to a greater extent than existing medications. With 96% of those in the medication group finishing the study, researchers concluded that the drug was safe and well tolerated in this population.

Replication studies will be needed to further confirm the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of semaglutide at higher doses in this population, and to identify patient subgroups that are more or less responsive to GLP-1RAs.

Other UNC-based co-investigators on the study include Klara Klein, MD, PhD, assistant professor at the Department of Medicine’s Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism; Amanda Tow, MD, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry; and Robyn Jordan, MD, PhD, associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and medical director of the UNC Addiction Medicine Program.

Exploitation of supply chain monitoring loopholes fueled US opioid epidemic, study finds

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Newswise — BLOOMINGTON, Ind. — New research from the Indiana University Kelley School of Business explains how pharmaceutical companies were able to saturate the country with massive quantities of opioids, despite efforts by the Drug Enforcement Administration to regulate their supply.

The research identifies a loophole in the DEA’s monitoring system exploited by some pharmaceutical companies, leading to an oversupply of opioid drugs in communities. The hallmark of this activity was high supply chain complexity, such as pharmacies with dozens of distributors across the country.

The same research also documents how the opioid epidemic — commonly regarded as a national public health crisis among white Americans — had a much deeper impact in Black communities, where overdose deaths tripled from 2014 to 2020.

“We believe we are the first to uncover insights into the supply chain mechanisms that were used to evade the DEA and fuel the opioid crisis,” said Jonathan Helm, professor of operations and decision technologies and the W.W. Grainger Inc. Faculty Fellow at the Kelley School. “Up until now, the focus has been on each of the pharmaceutical companies individually, ignoring the huge impact of the broader supply chain.”

“No one was looking at it from a supply chain perspective,” added Iman Attari, a Kelley School doctoral candidate in operations and decision technologies and the paper’s corresponding author.

Attari, Helm and Jorge Mejia, an associate professor in the Kelley School, analyzed information in the 2019 release of the DEA’s Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System — commonly known as the ARCOS database — which tracked each shipment in the U.S. opioid supply chain from 2006 to 2014.

Their paper, “Hiding Behind Complexity: Supply Chain, Oversight, Race, and the Opioid Crisis,” appears in the latest issue of the journal Production and Operations Management.

The researchers uncovered how supply chain complexity may have facilitated the influx of large qualities of opioids into the market, undetected by the DEA. Their research combined ARCOS data about pharmacies’ opioid dispensing and supply chain structures with county-level demographics and socioeconomic factors.

Using a fixed effect model, they found that a one-unit increase across three dimensions of supply chain complexity was associated with a 16% increase in opioid dispensing.

DEA monitoring involves using ARCOS to collect data on all shipments of controlled substances, and requiring manufacturers and distributors to report suspicious orders of unusual size and frequency.

“The issue was that pharmacies wanting to have large shipments were very smart about it,” Attari said. “Instead of placing an order for a large shipment from one single distributor, they broke down that large order across multiple distributors. They got smaller shipments from different distributors; when added up, it was a huge order. Each distributor is only going to see the data from the pharmacy that links themselves to it, and not to shipments from other distributors.”

As a result, the DEA monitoring system failed. By using more suppliers, pharmacies were able to evade detection.

Another factor they studied was the location of distributors. Because of the DEA’s structure, with 23 often independently operated field divisions spread across the U.S., the researchers found that a lack of coordination and aggregation of information among them was another factor in overlooking potentially suspicious activity.

“Even if a supplier reports a suspicious order in one division, other divisions that the pharmacy orders from are unlikely to be informed,” they wrote.

“It cannot be just ‘business,’ because when you look at it from a business standpoint, it makes more sense to work with one distributor because you benefit from economy of scale,” Attari said. “It is expected for a pharmacy to have one or two distributors, or at most three distributors of opioid drugs.

“When we saw pharmacies in the data set with 25 distributors — all over the U.S. — that was a strong indication that they were trying to mess with the monitoring system.”

The research found that supply chain complexity had a stronger association with the increase in opioid dispensing in non-white communities. A 10% increase in the non-white proportion of the population yielded a 3.39% increase in the overall dispensing by pharmacies with high supply chain complexity.

“Communities of color have been historically under-resourced and neglected by many government and social services,” the researchers wrote. “In the context of the opioid crisis, it appears that the DEA has spent more effort arresting non-White drug users than on regulating the flow of opioids from pharmaceutical companies into non-White communities.”

To be certain that their analysis was distinguishing between legitimate medical use and non-medical, recreational demand, they compared statistics for the reformulated OxyContin, which was redesigned to prevent abuse.

“In a novel approach, we leverage the fact that different pharmacies received their first shipment of reformulated OxyContin at different times and use a difference-in-differences model to estimate the heterogeneous effect of the shock on dispensing,” they wrote. “As the reformulated OxyContin stifled (non-medical) demand, high-complexity pharmacies experienced a 15.31% greater reduction in dispensing compared to lower-complexity pharmacies, suggesting that their excess dispensing was indeed satisfying non-medical/recreational demand.”

As a follow-up to this paper, the researchers are investigating the dynamics between major chain pharmacies and their distributors, and how they may facilitate the oversupply by pharmacies. Their initial findings suggest that the pharmacies’ practice of self-distribution, where they distribute opioids from their own distribution centers, combined with their close ties to large distributors, also may have led to excessive opioid dispensing without adequate oversight by the DEA.

Multiracial individuals face unique challenges that may lead to high rates of alcohol and other drug use

Newswise — Multiracial or mixed-race individuals – having parents or ancestors of different races – currently comprise more than 10 percent of the U.S. population. There is very little research on Multiracial individuals even though young adults in this group report high rates of alcohol and other drug (AOD) use: binge drinking, illicit drug use other than cannabis, and drug use disorders. New research explores what factors may contribute to high rates of substance use among this population. Results will be shared at the 47th annual scientific meeting of the Research Society on Alcohol (RSA) in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

“Multiracial people are a fast-growing racial demographic group in the U.S.,” said Tessa Nalven, a graduate student at the University of Rhode Island, “but are often rendered nearly invisible as a race. Yet Multiracial young adults often report their race as being among their most salient identities. Within the context of their high rates of AOD use, I hope to draw attention to their voices to help advocate for findings solutions to their unique concerns and challenges.”

Nalven will discuss her study’s findings at the RSA meeting on Sunday, 23 June 2024.

In the fall of 2021, she conducted four semi-structured, online focus groups with 22 (17 females, 5 males) Multiracial young adults 18 to 25 years of age with the objective of uncovering factors related to their AOD use. All study participants had self-reported previous six-month AOD use, and were recruited with the intention of collecting a diverse and heterogeneous sample.

“Multiracial young adults often report their race feels impactful across all aspects of their lives,” said Nalven, “resulting in feeling excluded and misunderstood in many contexts, which they also believe relates to high rates of AOD use. My study found that Multiracial young adults ascribe their high rates of substance use to: one, racial discrimination; two, environmental influences; three, identity development difficulties; four, struggles with fitting in; and five, mental health challenges.”

Nalven added that these unique social and environmental factors associated with AOD use in Multiracial young adults require unique interventions. “Interventions to ameliorate the disproportionate rates of AOD use among Multiracial young adults should address ways to respond to discrimination and mental health or racial identity concerns,” she said. “Moreover, systemic interventions are needed to educate communities to foster inclusive environments and reduce discrimination and inequitable treatment of Multiracial people.”

Nalven observed that the field of addiction research, and the science around mental-health concerns as a whole, have been too focused on single-racial – and primarily White – groups. “I believe there is important utility in studying Multiracial people as a cohesive group, without parsing out their separate identities; to examine the similarities – both strengths and struggles – that Multiracial young adults experience as a result of their similar lived experiences in the context of a monoracial and White-centric society.”