Looking for unique stories centered on the winter holidays? Check out the Winter Holidays channel

It’s the most wonderful time…of the year?

Are you looking for new story ideas that are focused on the winter holiday season? Perhaps you’re working on a story on managing stress and anxiety during the holidays? Perhaps you’re working on a story on seasonal affective disorder? Or perhaps your editor asked you to write a story on tracking Santa?  Look no further. Check out the Winter Holidays channel

Below are some of the latest story leads that concern this festive season.

Take a stab at avoiding holiday kitchen accidents this year

-Midwest Orthopaedics at RUSH

People who live farther from the equator may be more likely to experience seasonal affective disorder

-Baylor Scott and White Health

Expert shares strategies for managing holiday stress and anxiety

-Virginia Tech

More Than Just Joy and Laughter, Tips For Navigating The Hard Parts Of The Holidays: Anxiety, Stress, Loneliness, and Disappointment

-Hackensack Meridian Health

Healing Over the Holidays: A nurse’s guide to spending the holidays at the hospital

-Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Holiday gathering tips from Cornell family relationships expert

-Cornell University

Virginia Tech expert shares ways to have a more sustainable and eco-friendly holiday season

-Virginia Tech

Expert offers tips for caring for fresh holiday trees, like the U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree

-West Virginia University

Joy Takes the Holidays Off for Some Older People

-Cedars-Sinai

What’s behind the holiday-suicide myth

-Annenberg Public Policy Center

Ohio State survey finds Americans struggle to maintain healthy habits during the holiday season

-Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

MSU experts: What to know about consumer preferences this shopping season

-Michigan State University

Even a joyous holiday season can cause stress for most Americans

-American Psychological Association (APA)

Horticulture agent offers tips on winter holiday plant acquisition and care

-Virginia Tech

 

Prohibition may have extended life for those born in dry counties

Newswise — Although widely considered a blunder of public policy, the alcohol prohibition laws of early 20th century America may have led to increased longevity for those born in places where alcohol was banned, according to new research from the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

The study — recently published in the journal Economics and Human Biology and co-authored by Jason Fletcher of UW’s La Follette School of Public Affairs — is the first to research the long-term effects of Prohibition Era on longevity, adding to the understanding of the longer-term costs of alcohol exposure during pregnancy. The findings come as we mark the 90th anniversary of the repeal of prohibition on Dec. 5, 2023. They also come at a time when the rate of women who drink during pregnancy has recently increased from 9.2 percent in 2011 to 11.3 percent in 2018, according to the study. A 2022 CDC report found that number now stands at nearly 14 percent.

Using advanced analytical methods on data from the prohibition era, this study provides important nuance to the assessment of prohibition’s effects on public health and could have important implications for policies aimed at reducing maternal alcohol use.

“Researchers now understand that exposures during pregnancy, due to interruptions to fetal development, can have long term cascading effects on later-life health,” Fletcher says. “Modern evaluation tools and new data opportunities allow us to look back at policies from 100 years ago to assess their long-term impact in ways we’ve never been able to do before.”

Fletcher and his co-author, Hamid Noghanibehambari from Austin Peay State University and an affiliate of UW–Madison’s Center for Demography of Health and Aging, used Social Security Administration death records from 1975-2005 that were linked to the 1940 U.S. census. They identified counties of residence and determined whether alcohol sales were legal or prohibited at the time of birth.

Because parts of the country became “dry” through state and federal regulation at different times between 1900-1930, data from this period served as a natural experiment for investigating these effects. Fletcher and Noghanibehambari were able to compare the old-age longevity of individuals who were exposed to prohibition laws during early life and childhood to those who were not.

They found that being born in a county that went dry due to state or federal regulations  correlated with roughly 0.17 additional years of longevity during old age. Taking other factors into account, such as the likelihood of women drinking during pregnancy at a time when little was known about the dangers of maternal alcohol consumption, they calculated that prohibition may have resulted in an average of 1.7 additional years for those born in counties where alcohol was banned.

To better understand the size of this observed increase in longevity, the study also compared these results with the overall change in life expectancy for Americans born between 1900-1930. Overall, this group experienced a sharp and unprecedented increase of about 11.8 years in life expectancy due to factors such as improvements in medical technology and increases in income and welfare. The effect of 1.7 years due to exposure to the temperance movement is equivalent to nearly 15% of the overall life expectancy improvements of those born at this time.

Along with recent studies that suggest that lowering alcohol availability due to prohibition reduced mortality, decreased drug-related crime and improved child health, this research helps shed light on the effects of alcohol policy on public health.

This research is funded in part by the National Institute of Aging (R01AG060109) and the UW–Madison Center for Demography of Health and Aging through a National Institute of Aging core grant (P30 AG17266).

1 in 8 older adults use cannabis products, suggesting need to screen for risks

Newswise — More older Americans use cannabis now than before the pandemic, with 12% saying they’ve consumed a THC-containing substance in the past year and 4% saying they do so multiple times a week, according to a new study of people aged 50 to 80. Those who drink alcohol at risky levels have a much higher rate of cannabis use.

The new findings, published in the journal Cannabis and Cannabinoids Research by a team from the University of Michigan’s Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, suggest a need for more education and screening of older adults for cannabis-related risks.

“As the stress of the pandemic and the increased legalization of cannabis by states converged, our findings suggest cannabis use increased among older adults nationally. Older adults represent a vulnerable age group for cannabis use due to interactions with medications, risky driving, cannabis-related mental health impacts and increased possibility of falls and memory issues,” said Anne Fernandez, Ph.D., an addiction psychologist in the U-M Addiction Center and Department of Psychiatry who led the study.

The data in the study come from the National Poll on Healthy Aging, which IHPI runs with funding from AARP and Michigan Medicine, U-M’s academic medical center. The national poll of 2,023 older adults was taken in January 2021, nine months into the official pandemic declaration and just as the first COVID-19 vaccines were being made available to the groups at the highest risk.

The 12% overall past-year use of cannabis seen in the new study is higher than the 9.5% seen in 2019 by other researchers pre-pandemic, and far higher than the 3% seen in another study in 2006, when only 12 states had passed medical cannabis laws. The NPHA in 2017 found that 6% of older adults had used cannabis for medical purposes.

In the new study, in addition to the 4% who said they use cannabis products four or more times a week, another 5% said they use cannabis once a month or less. The poll question asked about use of any product containing THC, the main psychoactive component of cannabis — including edibles – and used multiple common names for cannabis. It did not differentiate between medical and recreational use of cannabis.

Older adults who said they were unemployed, those who said they were unmarried and had no partner, and those who said they drank alcohol were more likely to say they used cannabis.

Fernandez notes an especially concerning finding: those whose alcohol use was high enough to cause physical and psychological harms were nearly eight times as likely to say they had used cannabis in the past year. But even those with low-risk alcohol drinking patterns were more than twice as likely to say they had used cannabis in the past year.

This group of dual-substance users is one that doctors and public health officials should pay special attention to, she said.

“Other research has shown that using both alcohol and cannabis increases the chance that a person will drive while impaired,” she explained. “They are also more likely to have physical and mental health issues, including substance use disorders. Screening for alcohol use, cannabis use, and other drug use could help more people get counseling and reduce their risk and risk to others.”

While there were no statistical differences among older adults by age, health or mental health status, income or education, those who said they had Hispanic backgrounds were less likely than non-Hispanic older adults to say they used cannabis. Fernandez says this is consistent with other research showing lower cannabis use in the Latino community.

She advises any older adult who chooses to use cannabis products for any reason to be open with their health care provider about it, especially if they also drink alcohol or take certain medications. Physicians, nurse practitioners and pharmacists can advise if any medications a person is taking might interact with cannabis, including ones for insomnia, depression and anxiety, opioid-containing pain medications, seizure medications, and blood thinners.

For more about the poll methodology, see https://www.healthyagingpoll.org/survey-methods

In addition to Fernandez, the study’s authors are U-M addiction psychologist Lara Coughlin, Ph.D., poll deputy director Erica S. Solway, Ph.D., poll manager Dianne C. Singer, poll director Jeffrey T. Kullgren, M.D., M.S., M.P.H., poll data lead Matthias Kirch, M.S. and Preeti N. Malani, M.D., former poll director and current poll senior advisor.

 

In addition to the poll funding, Fernandez has research funding from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA023869).

Prevalence and Frequency of Cannabis Use Among Adults Ages 50–80 in the United States, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, DOI: 10.1089/can.2023.0056 https://doi-org.proxy.lib.umich.edu/10.1089/can.2023.0056

Substance abuse treatment helps reduce reported methamphetamine use among men who have sex with men

Newswise — A nearly decade-long study by UCLA researchers found that substance abuse treatment of any kind may help to reduce methamphetamine usage among men who have sex with other men – a population that has been disproportionately impacted by the U.S. methamphetamine crisis in recent years.

The findings come from the mSTUDY, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and are published in the Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment. The study analyzed responses from a group of nearly 300 men in Los Angeles who self-reported how frequently they used methamphetamine in the previous six months and whether they were receiving substance use treatment during that time. The reports were collected from 2014-2022 with a total of 285 participants who reported using methamphetamine at least once.

UCLA researchers found that daily methamphetamine users who were receiving some form of substance use treatment – whether it be for meth, opioids, cannabis or other substances — were twice as likely to report a reduction in their methamphetamine usage during their next visit compared to those not receiving treatment.

Additionally, they found participants who received a form of substance use treatment had longer periods of abstinence as well as reduced periods of weekly or daily use. Researchers say the findings highlight the importance of treatment programs that focus on use reduction rather than those that require a commitment to abstinence.

“It speaks to that fact that even though treatment options for methamphetamine are limited, it’s important to be able to try and increase access to treatment for people and increase treatment options,” said Allison Rosen, the study’s lead author and an epidemiologist at the UCLA Department of Family Medicine. “And that treatment of some kind seems to work. We can’t really say what the mechanism is but maybe just being connected to the treatment system is valuable in itself.”

The mSTUDY’s lead investigators are Drs. Pamina Gorbach, Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health and Division of Infectious Disease, David Geffen School of Medicine and Steven Shoptaw, Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine.

“These findings are groundbreaking in showing that people reduce their frequency of methamphetamine use following substance use treatment,” Shoptaw said. “The health benefits to reducing methamphetamine use include lowering risks for drug-related physical adverse effects and improving odds for better social, economic, and mental health status. These data provide strong evidence supporting the significance of outcomes to substance use treatment beyond requirements for complete abstinence.”

The U.S. has seen a significant rise in methamphetamine use and in recent years. A National Institutes of Health study in 2021 found that from 2015 through 2019, the number of American adults who reported using meth for more than 100 days of the year increased by 66% while the number of overdose deaths increased by 180%. Recent studies have shown men who have sex with men are disproportionately more likely than the general population to use methamphetamine, which can increase the transmission of HIV through high-risk sexual practices such as having sex without a condom. Methamphetamine has also been linked to poor treatment outcomes and accelerated disease progression of men with HIV.

But compared to other substances such as opioids, methamphetamine has comparatively fewer treatment options and none that have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rosen said.

While Rosen said there have controlled, clinical trials of some methamphetamine treatments that provide a point-in-time perspective, Rosen said her study is unique in being an observational study that tracks methamphetamine use in the real world over a longer time period.

“What’s really important here is that we’re providing some evidence outside of the very controlled clinical trial setting that substance use treatment may be able to help folks reduce their methamphetamine use,” Rosen said.

Rosen said further research is needed on other factors including the comparative effectiveness of individual treatment methods for methamphetamine use, how the simultaneous use of other substances can impact methamphetamine use of participants and how more frequent reporting of methamphetamine use can affect how frequently participants use methamphetamine.

Article: Association of current substance use treatment with future reduced methamphetamine use in an observational cohort of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles Published Nov. 14, 2023, Rosen et al. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, Volume 157, 2024, 209228, ISSN 2949-8759, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2023.209228

Workplace culture is very different these days. Find out how different by exploring the “In the Workplace” channel

According to a recent study that polled workers in Australia, 45% of workers would be willing to accept a pay cut in exchange for remote work flexibility. Australians are not alone in their quest for a better work-life balance. 56% of 125 million full-time U.S. workers said they don’t have to be in the workplace anymore because they discovered—thanks to the pandemic—that they can do their jobs from home. it’s clear that the pandemic and uncertainty about the future of work have spurred workers to find better opportunities.

Below are some of the latest articles on occupational medicine, workplace culture, and the labor market from the “In the Workplace” channel on Newswise.

Remote work, reduced pay: are we willing to make a trade?

-University of South Australia

Cornell professor says there is evidence weight impacts employment as NYC puts new discrimination law into effect

-Cornell University

Standard inflation measures failing to fully capture cost-of-living pressures for people on lower incomes

-Loughborough University

When Occupational Therapy Becomes Occupational Justice

-Tufts University

Physician burnout reduced with peer support, study finds

-Kaiser Permanente

Business and Society Podcast: The Labor Movement

-University of Michigan Ross School of Business

Analyzing the New Workday Dead Zone: The Power Dynamics and Science of It

-University of Maryland, Robert H. Smith School of Business

Paid family leave boosted postpartum wellbeing, breastfeeding rates

-Northwestern University

UAW, Ford resolution will have ‘ripple effects’ on union work worldwide

-Cornell University

Female board members help improve firms’ corporate sustainability reporting

-University of Portsmouth

Harsh workplace climate is pushing women out of academia

-University of Colorado Boulder

 

Mount Sinai Creates Research Center Focusing on Opioids, Emerging Substances, and Drug Overdose

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE           

Contact:  Ilana Nikravesh
                Mount Sinai Press Office
                212-241-9200
                [email protected]

Mount Sinai Creates Research Center Focusing on Opioids, Emerging Substances, and Drug Overdose
Center aims to transform treatment and care for patients in Emergency Departments across the United States

Newswise — (New York, NY – November 28, 2023) – The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai announced today the launch of a new center for “Research on Emerging Substances, Poisoning, and Overdose, for New Discoveries,” to be known as the RESPOND Center. Its research findings could lead to major advances in this area of medicine, including better treatments for patients with drug overdoses in emergency departments across the United States.

“Each day, clinicians on the front lines bear witness to devastating impacts from the current epidemic of substance use and illicit opioid overdose, not just to individuals, but to their families and communities. RESPOND Center researchers are making significant contributions to the field by focusing on the identification of emerging substances, the treatment of addiction as well as nonfatal overdose, and the prevention of adverse events to our patients,” says Alex Manini, MD, MS, the Director of the RESPOND Center, and a Professor of Emergency Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

“Research is a team sport, and the RESPOND Center focuses on multidisciplinary approaches to problem-solving, bringing together experts from various fields, including toxicology, addiction, psychiatry, pharmacology, emergency medicine, and public health,” Dr. Manini adds. “Through important collaborations with the American College of Medical Toxicology, the Centers for Forensic Science Research Education, the National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, among others, we hope our efforts will result in a significant reduction in overdose-related deaths in the United States.”

More than 100,000 people in the United States died from drug-involved overdoses in 2021, the majority from opioid drugs. In 2022, 3,026 New Yorkers died of a drug overdose, a 12 percent increase from 2021 and the highest number since reporting began in 2000. Fentanyl is one of those deadly opioids, and 25 percent of the fentanyl supply includes xylazine, an animal sedative. This has become a recent, growing threat that is leading to increased rates of addiction and adverse events such as severe skin lesions, hypothermia, and heart and respiratory issues. A subclass of opioid drugs called nitazenes are now emerging in the illicit opioid supply in the United States and are even more potent than fentanyl. According to a recent study in JAMA led by Dr. Manini, nitazenes add a layer of complexity to the dangers of illicit drug use, leading to a significantly increased rate of cardiac arrest in overdose cases and requiring significantly higher doses of naloxone for in-hospital treatment when compared to fentanyl overdoses. The RESPOND Center will prioritize researching these new threats.

This new center will conduct clinical research on a wide range of topics focused on opioids, synthetic opioids, hallucinogens, stimulant drugs including cocaine and methamphetamines, emerging drugs, and health services. Researchers will collect and analyze data from patients across emergency departments within the Mount Sinai Health System to advance knowledge and understanding of overdose, poisonings, and substance use disorders and discover new treatments.

Researchers from the RESPOND Center will draw from $14 million in grants from various institutions including the National Institute on Drug Abuse; the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; and the National Institute of Mental Health to study non-deadly drug overdose, fentanyl analogues, opioid use disorders, and emergency room patient management. The work of the RESPOND Center also involves collaboration between Mount Sinai’s Department of Emergency Medicine, the Medical Toxicology Division, the Addiction Institute of Mount Sinai, and the American College of Medical Toxicology.

“Through this center, we hope to establish best practices for addressing the needs of patients who are exposed to the continuous flow of new drugs of abuse. We aim to define the unique risks of each of these substances and develop and deploy programs to mitigate these risks in a way that keeps people safe and alive,” says Ethan Cowan, MD, Professor of Emergency Medicine at Icahn Mount Sinai. “Given the severity of the overdose epidemic, this work will be critical to stemming the flow of opioid overdose deaths. The center will also offer mentorship and training for a new generation of emergency medicine researchers who have a passion for improving the care and treatment for our most vulnerable patient populations.”

For more information on the RESPOND Center click on the link below:

https://icahn.mssm.edu/about/departments/emergency-medicine/research/respond-center

About the Mount Sinai Health System

Mount Sinai Health System is one of the largest academic medical systems in the New York metro area, with more than 43,000 employees working across eight hospitals, more than 400 outpatient practices, more than 300 labs, a school of nursing, and a leading school of medicine and graduate education. Mount Sinai advances health for all people, everywhere, by taking on the most complex health care challenges of our time—discovering and applying new scientific learning and knowledge; developing safer, more effective treatments; educating the next generation of medical leaders and innovators; and supporting local communities by delivering high-quality care to all who need it. Through the integration of its hospitals, labs, and schools, Mount Sinai offers comprehensive health care solutions from birth through geriatrics, leveraging innovative approaches such as artificial intelligence and informatics while keeping patients’ medical and emotional needs at the center of all treatment. The Health System includes approximately 7,400 primary and specialty care physicians; 13 joint-venture outpatient surgery centers throughout the five boroughs of New York City, Westchester, Long Island, and Florida; and more than 30 affiliated community health centers. Hospitals within the System are consistently ranked by Newsweek’s® “The World’s Best Smart Hospitals, Best in State Hospitals and Best World Hospitals” and by U.S. News & World Report‘s® “Best Hospitals” and “Best Children’s Hospitals.” The Mount Sinai Hospital is on the U.S. News & World Report® “Best Hospitals” Honor Roll for 2023-2024.

For more information, visit https://www.mountsinai.org or find Mount Sinai on FacebookTwitter and YouTube.

###

Alcohol Consumption May Have Positive and Negative Effects on Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Newswise — While past research has indicated that moderate alcohol consumption can lower one’s risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), more recent studies suggest that moderate levels of drinking may be hazardous to heart health. A new analysis led by Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) and the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University now sheds new insight on this complex relationship between alcohol consumption and the progression of CVD. 

Published in the journal BMC Medicine, the study found that alcohol consumption may have counteractive effects on CVD risk, depending on the biological presence of certain circulating metabolites—molecules that are produced during or after a substance is metabolized and studied as biomarkers of many diseases.  

The researchers observed a total of 60 alcohol consumption-related metabolites, identifying seven circulating metabolites that link long-term moderate alcohol consumption with an increased risk of CVD, and three circulating metabolites that link this same drinking pattern with a lower risk of CVD.  

The findings provide a better understanding of the molecular pathway of long-term alcohol consumption and highlight the need for and direction of further research on these metabolites to inform targeted prevention and treatment of alcohol-related CVD. 

“The study findings demonstrate that alcohol consumption may trigger changes of our metabolomic profiles, potentially yielding both beneficial and harmful outcomes,” says Chunyu Liu, assistant professor of biostatistics at BUSPH and co-corresponding/co-senior author of the study along with Jiantao Ma, assistant professor in the Division of Nutrition Epidemiology and Data Science at the Friedman School. “Because the majority of our study participants are moderate alcohol consumers, our findings contribute to the ongoing discussion about the relationship between moderate alcohol drinking and heart health.”  

“However, rather than definitively settling that debate, this study underscores the intricate effects of alcohol consumption on cardiovascular health and generates a useful hypothesis for future investigations,” Liu says. 

For the study, the researchers examined blood samples to measure the association between the cumulative average consumption over 20 years of beer, wine, and liquor and 211 metabolites among 2,428 Framingham Heart Study Offspring Study participants, who are the children of participants in the long-running Boston University-based Framingham Heart Study. Among the participants, 636 developed CVD over the study period.  

Among the 60 drinking-related metabolites, 13 metabolites had a stronger association with alcohol consumption in women than in men, perhaps due to women’s generally smaller body size and likely higher blood alcohol concentration after consuming the same amount of alcohol as men.  

The results also showed that consumption of different types of alcohol was linked to different metabolomic responses, with beer consumption generating a slightly weaker association overall than wine and liquor. In roughly two-thirds of the 60 metabolites, higher plasma levels were detected in participants who consumed greater amounts of alcohol.  

Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) were among the metabolites that were not associated with alcohol consumption.  

The researchers then calculated two alcohol consumption-associated metabolite scores, which had opposite associations with the development of CVD. 

“While our study presents intriguing findings, validation through state-of-the-art methods and large and diverse study populations is crucial,” Ma says. “To enhance reliability, we aim to conduct larger-scale research involving a more diverse racial and ethnic background, as the current study participants are all white. In addition, we will expand our study to integrate with other molecular markers such as genetic information to illustrate the complex relationships between alcohol consumption, metabolite features, and cardiovascular risk.” 

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism under award R01AA028263. Data collection in the Framingham Heart Study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Complete information on authors, funders, methodology, limitations, and conflicts of interest is available in the published paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders. 

Genomic study links cannabis abuse to multiple health problems

Newswise — New Haven, Conn. — A Yale-led analysis of the genomes of more than 1 million people has shed light on the underlying biology of cannabis use disorder and its links to psychiatric disorders, abuse of other substances such as tobacco, and possibly even an elevated risk of developing lung cancer.

For the study, researchers examined a genome-wide set of genetic variants in individuals from multiple ancestry groups enrolled in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Million Veteran Program, one of the world’s largest genetic databases, and incorporated additional information from several other genomic databases. They were able to identify dozens of genetic variants linked to cannabis use disorder and a variety of behavioural and health issues associated with cannabis use disorder.

The study, led by Daniel Levey, assistant professor of psychiatry, and Joel Gelernter, the Foundations Fund Professor of Psychiatry and professor of genetics and of neuroscience, was published Nov. 20 in the journal Nature Genetics.

“Once we understand the biology of cannabis use disorder, we can better understand associated disorders and inform the public of risks associated with marijuana use,” said Levey, lead author of the study.

Marijuana is the most commonly used federally illegal drug in the United States, with more than 48 million people (18% of Americans) using it at least once in 2019, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Previous research has shown that roughly one-third of people who use marijuana develop cannabis use disorder, which is defined as a problematic pattern of cannabis use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress.

The new findings offer insights into the genetic factors that underlie this phenomenon, and other potentially related health risks.

For instance, they found that variants of genes that encode for three different types of receptors on neurons were associated with elevated risk for developing cannabis use disorder.

And they found that these variants linked to cannabis use disorder were also associated with the development of lung cancer. The authors added, however, that more work needs to be done to separate the effects tobacco use and other environmental factors have on cancer diagnoses from those of marijuana use.

“This is the largest genome-wide study of cannabis use disorder ever conducted and as more states legalize or decriminalize the use of marijuana, such studies can help us to understand the public health risks that accompany its increase.

From tobacco to alcohol to opioids, Sanford Burnham Prebys researchers are pursuing novel leads and promising therapies to treat addiction

Newswise — Addiction is perhaps the most and least visible of public health crises in the United States.

Tens of millions of Americans are addicted to illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco and other substances including opioids, with both immediate and long-term harm to not just themselves, but also family, friends and society.

At the same time, many of those affected deny or hide their addictions. Most do not seek help. A 2021 national survey on drug use and health by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), for example, found that 94% of people aged 12 or older with a substance use disorder did not receive any treatment. Nearly all of them thought they did not require it.

The underlying psychology of denial is complicated, often involving behaviors to avoid adverse consequences and fear of stigma. There is another factor too: Treatments for addiction are myriad, but success is far from assured.

“Whatever the source of the addiction, the result is a chronic, relapsing brain disorder for which specific, approved treatments may be few, limited in their effectiveness and sometimes not broadly accessible,” says David Brenner, M.D., president and CEO of Sanford Burnham Prebys.

“That’s why the work we do here is so important. Before you can truly treat something as complex as addiction, you need to deeply understand how it works. Substances such as alcohol and fentanyl may share underlying pathologies and yet, they are different.

“With that knowledge, you can begin to discover and test new therapeutic approaches capable of breaking the addiction cycle and restoring health.”

In recent months, researchers at Sanford Burnham Prebys have earned a series of federal grants and awards, totaling almost $25 million, to advance research—including clinical trials—that may turn the rising tide and toll of addiction.

Here’s a snapshot of addiction research at Sanford Burnham Prebys, where it’s at and where it’s going.

Tobacco

Smoking continues to be the leading cause of preventable deaths in the United States, and the second leading cause of preventable deaths worldwide after hypertension (of which smoking is a risk factor).

Smoking continues to be the leading cause of preventable deaths in the United States, and the second leading cause of preventable deaths worldwide after hypertension (of which smoking is a risk factor).

“Current Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for nicotine addiction work less than 30% of the time,” says Nicholas Cosford, Ph.D., co-director and professor in the Cancer Molecular Therapeutics Program at Sanford Burnham Prebys’ Cancer Center. “Relapse is common after quitting. In any given year, 30% to 50% of U.S. smokers will attempt to quit, but the success rate is low, just 7.5%.”

Cosford, in collaboration with colleagues at UC San Diego and Camino Pharma LLC, a San Diego-based biotechnology company he co-founded, has received a $9 million award from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to advance an investigational drug called SBP-9330 to Phase 2 clinical trials.

“Our drug, SBP-9330, works through a different mechanism distinct from currently available medicines,” says Cosford. “It’s taken orally. It may give people who want to quit smoking a new, safe, effective way to kick the habit.”

Methods to treat nicotine addiction are quite limited. They include cognitive therapies and nicotine replacements such as transdermal patches and chewing gum. Only two drugs have been approved, bupropion and varenicline, but both drugs have significant side effects that lead to quit rates of approximately 20%.

Originally discovered by Cosford’s research team at Sanford Burnham Prebys, SBP-9330 targets a neuronal signaling pathway that underlies addictive behaviors, including tobacco use. If ultimately approved for market, it would be a first-in-class oral therapeutic to help people quit smoking.

The compound works by selectively targeting and reducing levels of glutamate, a master neurotransmitter vital to memory, cognition and mood regulation and specifically linked to addiction and relapse behavior.

In preclinical studies, SBP-9330 reduced nicotine self-administration in animal studies. In a Phase 1 clinical trial, the compound was found to be safe and well-tolerated in human.

“Our research suggests that SBP-9330’s mechanism of action—how it works—may also be effective for other types of addiction, such as cocaine, opioid and methamphetamine,” says Douglas Sheffler, Ph.D., co-principal investigator with Cosford and a research assistant professor at Sanford Burnham Prebys.

“In the future, we hope to explore and broaden the drug’s therapeutic uses.”

Alcohol

More people consume alcohol in the U.S. than any other addictive substance: 133 million at last count. Almost half of them, according to the 2021 SAMHSA survey, are binge drinkers (five or more drinks on an occasion for men, four or more for women).

Alcohol addiction is dually reinforcing. It activates the brain’s reward system to produce feelings of pleasure, but also causes negative emotional states, such as anxiety and emotional pain. Alcohol addiction—and the diagnosis of alcohol use disorder—happens when consumption veers from drinking for pleasure to drinking motivated by attempts to reduce the emotional and physical discomfort of not drinking.

Sheffler is principal investigator and Cosford co-investigator on a $4 million award from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) to support the advancement of small molecule compounds targeting the corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) system in the brain.

CRF is a hormone regulated by two proteins, designated CRF1 and CRF2, that produce a wide range of physiological responses to stress, from appetite suppression and increased anxiety to improved memory and selective attention.

Sheffler, Cosford and colleagues have developed small molecule compounds that can inhibit the interaction between CRFs and CRF-binding proteins, effectively dampening the stress connection and its promotion of alcohol addiction. The new funding will further animal studies to validate their approach.

With a different $1.97 million NIAAA grant, Sheffer as principal investigator and Cosford as co-investigator will take a page from their smoking research to explore whether compounds called positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) can be used to target the same glutamate neurotransmitters involved in other types of addiction.

“We think this approach might effectively treat multiple symptoms that contribute to alcohol dependence and relapse, including reduced responsiveness to other drug cues, physical withdrawal symptoms and sleep disturbances,” says Sheffler. “The goal is to assess whether these PAMs represent a new pharmacological treatment for alcohol use disorder.”

Opioids

No addiction epidemic garners more headlines or greater notoriety than drug abuse, specifically the dramatic rise in overdose deaths fueled by synthetic opioids such as fentanyl, a powerful analgesic typically used to treat patients with severe pain, especially after surgery. Fentanyl is similar to morphine but 50 to 100 times more potent.

In 2021, fentanyl and other synthetic opioids accounted for nearly 71,000 of 107,000 fatal drug overdoses in the U.S. By comparison, in 1999 drug-involved overdose deaths totaled less than 20,000 among all ages and genders.

Like other addictive substances, opioids are intimately related to the brain’s dopamine-based reward system. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that serves critical roles in memory, movement, mood and attention. High or low dopamine levels are associated with conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and restless leg syndrome.

But dopamine is perhaps best known for its role in the brain’s reward system where it acts as the “feel-good” hormone. Our brains are hard-wired to seek out behaviors that release dopamine, which is why junk food and sugar can be addictive. The more you eat them, the greater the dopamine release.

The same principle applies to opioid use, only with stronger and more dire effects.

For several years, Michael Jackson, Ph.D. senior vice president of drug discovery and development at Sanford Burnham Prebys’ Conrad Prebys Center for Chemical Genomics and co-principal investigator Lawrence Barak, M.D., Ph.D. at Duke University, have been developing a completely new class of drugs that works by targeting a receptor on neuron called neurotensin 1 receptor or NTSR1, that regulates dopamine release.

The researchers recently received a $6.3 million award from NIH and NIDA to advance their addiction drug candidate, called SBI-810, to the clinic.

Earlier studies found no easy way to affect NTSR1 function without causing significant adverse side effects. In 2019, Sanford Burnham Prebys researchers, in collaboration with Barak and Lauren M. Slosky, Ph.D. at Duke University, described encouraging results with a drug candidate they discovered called SBI-533. The compound modulates NTSR1 signaling and shows robust efficacy in mouse models of addiction with no adverse side effects.

SBI-810 is an improved version of SBI-533. Both are small molecules that can be taken orally and readily cross the blood-brain barrier to reach NTR1 receptors. The new funding will be used to complete preclinical studies and initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate safety in humans.

“The novel mechanism of action and broad efficacy of SBI-810 in preclinical models hold the promise of a truly new, first-in-class treatment for patients affected by addictive behaviors,” says Jackson.

Jackson and colleagues also have a $2.15 million grant from the NIH and NIDA to develop a novel, brain-penetrating small molecule that modulates the function of another brain receptor, GPR88. GPR88 is an orphan G-protein coupled receptor that, in mouse studies, was found to inhibit opioid receptor signaling. The goal is to develop a drug that binds GPR88 and diminishes addiction-relevant behavioral responses to opioid drugs and lessens the anguish of withdrawal.

“This is a new drug target in a field that needs as many new, viable targets as we can find,” says Jackson. “Given preclinical observations, we want to leverage our expertise at the Prebys Center to formally validate whether GPR88 is a high-potential target and, if so, pursue it as a new therapy for long-term abstinence from opioid use.”


THE BIOLOGY OF ADDICTION

By definition, people with addictions lose control over their actions, whether it’s tobacco, alcohol, drugs or other substances. They crave and seek them regardless of adverse consequences and struggle or fail when trying to quit.

Much of the power of addiction lies in its ability to hijack, circumvent or even destroy key parts of the brain that would moderate or block addictive behaviors. Fundamentally, this involves the addictive substance subverting neural regions normally involved in rewarding healthy behaviors, such as exercising or bonding with loved ones.

Instead, addictive substances hijack these pleasure/reward circuits to promote ever-greater consumption, and may trigger other circuits that boost adverse feelings of anxiety, stress or paranoia.

Repeated use can damage the essential decision-making region in the front of the brain, reducing the conscious ability to recognize the harms of addictive substances.


SUBSTANCE ABUSE SPANS ADDICTIONS, FROM TOBACOO TO ALCOHOL TO ILLICIT DRUGS.

 

Tobacco

Commercial cigarette smoking among U.S. adults has declined over the past 50 years. Nonetheless, an estimated 46 million U.S. adults use tobacco products, including cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco and pipes.

Tobacco is indisputably harmful to health. It is the leading cause of preventable disease and death, accounting for more than 480,000 deaths every year in the United States, or about 1 in 5 deaths.

Cigarette smoking is responsible for approximately 90% of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cases. It is cause or risk factor for many other cancers. Tobacco use is strongly linked to heart disease, stroke, asthma, diabetes, adverse reproductive effects in women, premature and low birth-weight babies and age-related macular degeneration.

Nicotine, the chief active constituent in tobacco, is highly addictive. For regular cigarette smokers, addiction is almost inevitable. Even for light smokers—those who smoke one to four cigarettes per day or fewer—a 2020 study found they met the criteria for nicotine addiction.

Quitting smoking is difficult. Roughly seven in 10 adult cigarette smokers surveyed say they want to stop; and more than half of smokers attempt to quit each year. The success rate is less than 8%. Similar numbers apply to youth tobacco users.
 

Alcohol

According to the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 219.2 million Americans ages 12 and older say they have consumed alcohol at some point in their lives; 133 million are current alcohol users and 60 million are binge drinkers. Almost 85 percent of Americans age 18 (the lowest legal drinking age in some states) and older report having done so, but one in five youths between ages 12 and 17 also report drinking alcohol.

Addiction to alcohol can manifest physiologically, psychologically or both. Alcohol Use Disorder (colloquially known as alcoholism) describes an inability to control drinking. In 2021, almost 30 million Americans ages 21 and older suffered from AUD, including 894,000 U.S. adolescents ages 12 to 17.

Alcohol is a primary cause of liver disease and related deaths: more than 100,530 in 2021 alone. One in three liver transplants is due to alcohol-associated liver disease; and 4 percent of all cancer deaths are attributable to alcohol consumption.

Alcohol abuse and addiction carry broad and calamitous consequences for society. More than 10 percent of U.S. children ages 17 and younger liver with a parent who has AUD. Alcohol plays a role in more than 7% of emergency department visits, and is linked to more than 140,000 deaths annually, making alcohol the fourth-leading preventable cause of death in the U.S. after tobacco, poor diet and physical activity and illegal drugs.

Drugs

Drug overdose deaths nationwide are rising, most sharply in recent years, according to data compiled by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. In 1999, for example, drug-involved overdose deaths totaled under 20,000 among all ages and genders. In 2021, the figure was 106,699.

Synthetic opioids (mostly fentanyl) were the primary scourge, accounting for nearly 71,000 fatal overdoses reported in 2021. Stimulants including cocaine and methamphetamine, accounted for more than 32,500 deaths in 2021.

In 2021, more than 60 million persons in the U.S. age 12 and older had used illicit drugs in the past year, most commonly marijuana. Nearly 10 million had misused opioids. Twenty-four million persons met the criteria for having a drug use disorder; almost all (94%) of whom received no treatment.

Drug abuse and addiction is strongly linked to mental health, with nearly one in three adults reporting either a substance use disorder or mental illness, such as major depression or suicide ideation.

Pain Scores, Age Can Help Identify Patients More Likely to Use Few or No Opioids After Surgery

Newswise — PHILADELPHIA— Patients who are younger or who haven’t taken opioid pain medication before are more likely to not need any after many common surgeries, according to new research from the Perelman School of Medicine. Additionally, the study, published in Annals of Surgery Open, showed that simply understanding a patient’s history with opioids and how they are feeling upon leaving the hospital could help clinicians tailor the amount of prescription pain medicines they may need as they transition home.

“At face value, it seems quite simple that asking patients about their pain and use of pain medicine would help inform what we do, but it is often easy to lose sight of the value of these patient-informed moments,” said first author Anish Agarwal, MD, an assistant professor of Emergency Medicine and the deputy director of the Penn Medicine Center for Insights to Outcomes. “These are simple data points, but they could be used in a high impact way to help manage pain, tailor prescribing, and support clinicians who are trying to better balance the risks of opioids while addressing expected pain following surgery.”

The study, co-led by Kit Delgado, MD, an associate professor of emergency medicine and epidemiology and the director of the Penn Medicine Nudge Unit and co-chair of the Penn Medicine Opioid Task Force, used data collected through automated text messages sent to approximately 3,600 patients who had one of the 30 most common surgical procedures at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Mostly, these surgeries fell under the umbrella of orthopaedic (such as hip or knee procedures) or neurosurgery (spine or back procedures).

Among the questions surgery patients were asked via text message were whether they filled their opioid prescription, their pain level on a scale of one to ten, how well they felt they could manage the pain, and how many opioid tablets they actually used.

“Previously, our team had used this automated text messaging program to generate procedure-specific guidelines, and these guidelines recommended a default quantity that would cover most patient needs, though most would need less and some needed more,” Delgado said. “We wanted to use the data to identify some common factors that could guide clinicians to “right size” prescriptions based on a patient’s personal characteristics.”

Overall, of patients who hadn’t taken opioids before (termed opioid naivety), more than half used either none or less than five of the opioid tablets they’d been prescribed. The researchers found that in hip replacements, patients who were opioid naïve and rated their pain low when being discharged used an average of about five opioid tablets while patients who had used opioids before and rated their pain high at discharge used an average of 20 tablets.

And in procedures where the hospitals’ guideline was to prescribe 15 opioid tablets or fewer, patients who were in the lowest age bracket (18-34 years old) and who hadn’t taken opioids before were significantly likely to not take any of the pain medication they were prescribed or, if they did, take just five tablets or fewer. The same held true in procedures where 20 opioid tablets were recommended.

Could it be possible that the opioid epidemic and new attention around it is affecting the way younger patients — who came of age during this time period — use pain medication?

“We know that clinicians are trying to prescribe fewer opioids and, anecdotally, we hear that patients have more concerns about opioid use,” said Agarwal. “Nonetheless, there are instances where opioids, when taken in limited quantities and for short periods, are effective tools to help patients manage severe pain – for instance after a major surgery. We’re hoping this work can alleviate some concerns, as well as some of the issues surrounding leftover medications.”

Because the researchers found a correlation between use of opioids and the severity of pain that patients reported upon discharge, the researchers believe that simple measures can be used in the moment by clinicians to help adjust prescriptions to specific patient needs. For example, if a patient reports their pain as a “3,” giving them the same amount of opioids than a patient rating their pain an “8” may not be necessary. And, by extension, that could help cut down on the leftover opioids after surgeries that can be misused and circulated.

For example, in hip replacements, again, the opioid naïve, low-pain patients only needed about five tablets of opioids. But opioid naïve patients who underwent the same procedure and rated their pain as high needed almost 15 tablets, on average.

This research extends other work by Agarwal, Delgado, and their colleagues seeking to cut down on the possibilities of having leftover opioids after surgeries. That includes mailing order disposal kits and using a texting program similar to the one in this study to monitor how many opioids patients used, in real-time.

“The next steps here are to take this research and translate it into actual clinical practice,” Agarwal said. “We’ve already used the feedback from our patients to help support our existing guidelines, and with this data our clinicians can become even more specific to personalize the approach to pain management for patients. We are beginning to see opportunities to help create new pathways for clinical decision support across large systems and for thousands of patients, but in a way that is still personalized based on their history and pain trajectory.”

This study was funded through the Food and Drug Administration (HHSF223201810209C).

###

Penn Medicine is one of the world’s leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, excellence in patient care, and community service. The organization consists of the University of Pennsylvania Health System and Penn’s Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine, founded in 1765 as the nation’s first medical school.

The Perelman School of Medicine is consistently among the nation’s top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $550 million awarded in the 2022 fiscal year. Home to a proud history of “firsts” in medicine, Penn Medicine teams have pioneered discoveries and innovations that have shaped modern medicine, including recent breakthroughs such as CAR T cell therapy for cancer and the mRNA technology used in COVID-19 vaccines.

The University of Pennsylvania Health System’s patient care facilities stretch from the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania to the New Jersey shore. These include the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Chester County Hospital, Lancaster General Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Health, and Pennsylvania Hospital—the nation’s first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional facilities and enterprises include Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Penn Medicine at Home, Lancaster Behavioral Health Hospital, and Princeton House Behavioral Health, among others.

Penn Medicine is an $11.1 billion enterprise powered by more than 49,000 talented faculty and staff.